Space Station Freedom
.

"First, for the coming decade, for the 1990s, Space Station Freedom, our critical next step in all our space endeavors. And next, for the next century, back to the Moon, back to the future, and this time, back to stay. And then a journey into tomorrow, a journey to another planet, a manned mission to Mars..."

-- President George Bush, July 21st 1989

With these words, President Bush directed NASA to start planning for ambitious new missions to the Moon and Mars. Vice President Dan Quayle and National Space Council director Mark Albrecht had been formulating the project in secret since June. This angered officials in the Office of Management and Budget, who complained about being kept in the dark and regarded the SEI as totally unrealistic since it would require a doubling of NASA's budget over the next ten years. Congress concurred since it had recently passed the Gramm-Rudman-Hollins deficit reduction act. There was no money in the federal budget for expensive new space endeavors. Nonetheless, NASA was asked to report back to the President's Space Council on how to implement the plan. The resulting "90-Day Study" prepared by a NASA/Johnson Space Center team led by JSC Director Aaron Cohen contained five alternatives but no specific recommendations. The five "reference approaches" had slightly different priorities: (A) balance and speed, (B) the earliest possible landing on Mars, (C) reduced logistics from Earth /in-situ resource utilization, (D) schedule adapted to Space Station Freedom, and (E) reduced scale. The timetable was as follows:
 
MILESTONE Reference Approach A Reference Approach B Reference Approach C Reference Approach D Reference Approach E
Lunar Emplacement 1999-2004 1999-2004 1999-2004 2002-2007 2002-2007
Lunar Consolidation 2004-2009 2004-2007 2004-2008 2007-2012 2008-2013
Lunar Operation 2010- 2005- 2005- 2013- 2014-
Humans on the Moon 2001 2001 2001 2004 2004
Permanent Habitation 2002 2002 2002 2005 -
Constructible Habitat 2005 2006 2007 2008 2011
Eight Crew 2006 2007 2007 2009 -
Lunar Oxygen Use 2010 2005 2005 2013 -
Lunar Farside Sortie 2012 2008 2008 2015 2022
Lunar Steady State Mode 2012 2008 2012 2015 -
           
Mars Emplacement 2015-2019 2010-2015 2015-2019 2017-2022 2024-
Mars Consolidation 2020-2022 2015-2018 2020-2022 2022- -
Mars Operation 2022- 2018- 2022- - -
Humans on Mars 2016 2011 2016 2018 2016
Extended Mars Stay 2018 2014 2018 2023 2027
An unmanned lunar sample-return craft departs Mare Imbrium. 

NASA would have spent $500 million in 1992-96 on resource surveys from unmanned lunar mapping satellites. A number of robotic rovers and sample return probes capable of returning 3kg samples to Earth would then have been sent to candidate sites for the moonbase. 

Meanwhile, NASA would be busy preparing the recently completed Space Station Freedom for its expanded role as a spaceport for manned lunar missions. The 60 x 35-meter "Dual Keel" beam structure that was postponed indefinitely in 1987-88 would have to be built after all -- initially to support flights of expendable moonbase cargo transfer vehicles. It would contain a hangar / servicing facility for reusable Lunar Transfer Vehicle "space tugs" (LTVs) and would cost at least $188 million. Two 75KW solar dynamic power generators would have to be added at a cost of at least $712 million. The additional power is required for the LTV facility and to support an enlarged crew of 14-16 astronauts temporarily for lunar missions. NASA identified four separate upgrades to Freedom that gradually would have increased its capabilities by adding more habitation modules, power, space vehicle processing facilities and crewmembers. The Space Station would support two lunar missions per year in 1999-2002 but there will be no Lunar Transfer Vehicle refurbishment capabilities at this point so all missions would have to be expendable. Additional solar-dynamic power generators and other equipment would permit LTV servicing in 2003- and Freedom would support up to three lunar missions per year beginning in 2004.


  PHASE ONE CONFIGURATION LUNAR TRANSFER VEHICLE VERIFICATION FLIGHT EXPENDABLE LUNAR TRANSFER VEHICLE OPERATIONS REUSABLE LUNAR TRANSFER VEHICLE OPERATIONS LUNAR & MARS OPERATIONS
NUMBER OF HABITATION MODULES 1 1 2 2 2
TRUSS STRUCTURE Transverse Boom only +Lower Keels & Lower Boom Lower Keels & Lower Boom Lower Keels & Lower Boom Upper & Lower Keels & Booms; Mars Vehicle Support Structure
POWER 75KW 125KW 125KW 175KW 175KW
CREW [Permanent] 8 10 10 12 12
CREW [Transient] - - 4 lunar astronauts 4 lunar astronauts 4 lunar or Mars
VEHICLE PROCESSING - Lunar Vehicle Service Track Assembly Enclosed Lunar Transfer Vehicle Hangar Enclosed Lunar Transfer Vehicle Hangar Enclosed Lunar Transfer Vehicle Hangar; Mars Vehicle Assembly Facility
NUMBER OF REMOTE MANIPULATORS 1 1 1 2 2
NUMBER OF MOBILE TRANSPORTERS 1 1 1 1 2

SHUTTLE-C. 

The Space Shuttle would transport lunar crews and cargo to Space Station Freedom, where they would be transferred to Lunar Transfer/Excursion Vehicles. The LTV,LEV and the propellant to land them on the Moon would meanwhile have been delivered to Freedom by Shuttle-derived unmanned heavy lift rockets. Three "Shuttle-C" launches would initially be required per lunar landing -- one for the spacecraft and two for the fuel. Each flight would deliver a net payload of 61-71 metric tons to the Space Station, and approximately 75% of the total mass delivered would be rocket propellant. Two different Shuttle-C versions would be required. The standard version depicted here would have a 25 x 4.6m cargo bay and could deliver compact 71-tonne payloads (mainly propellant tanks) to Freedom. The other version would have a 7.6-meter diameter payload shroud for launching large-diameter Lunar Excursion Vehicle and aerobrake elements. Its payload capability would only be 61 metric tons, and it would require some modifications to the Shuttle launch & payload processing facilities as well. The total cost of developing Shuttle-C would be $5.3 billion, including production of an initial batch of five vehicles. Some of these would be used to launch the final pieces of Space Station Freedom in 1996-97. This would have permitted NASA to end the Phase 1 Freedom construction work more quickly than if the considerably less powerful standard Space Shuttle were used.

A Lunar Transfer Vehicle (LTV) jettisons two propellant tanks after leaving Earth orbit.

Formerly known as the Orbital Transfer Vehicle, NASA renamed the vehicle in 1988 to stress its importance for manned lunar base missions. The LTV baseline was based on design work by Boeing who received a $2.5-million 18 month Phase A study contract in June 1989. NASA also awarded a similar contract to Martin Marietta. Boeing's LTV would provide transportation between Space Station Freedom and lunar orbit. The oxygen & hydrogen propellant (129.8t in all) would be stored in four 1.45-tonne expendable fuel tanks. The empty tanks would be discarded in Earth and lunar orbit to reduce the mass of the vehicle; 10% more fuel would have to be carried if the tanks have to be returned to Earth orbit for reuse. The basic, reusable LTV weighs 8.1t empty and consists of a propulsion/propellant/avionics module that holds 7t of propellant for returning to SS Freedom from lunar orbit. A large aerobrake protects the vehicle as it performs an "aerocapture maneuver" to kill off excess speed by passing through the Earth's upper atmosphere. This will save rocket propellant but the aerobrake will be heated to more than 1000K so it is made of advanced thermal protection materials. Aerobrake reuse for five missions is assumed, with refurbishment and verification at SS Freedom. The LTV would transport a crew of four astronauts in an 8.4-tonne passenger module as well as up to 22.4t of cargo in two external containers. Propulsion is provided by four 89 kilonewton-thrust rocket engines (481s Isp). 

Lunar Excursion Vehicle (right) rendezvous with LTV in lunar orbit.

The second component of the lunar transportation system was the LEV, which would transport crews and cargo between lunar orbit and the lunar surface. It would land up to 33t of cargo in an expendable mode (=use all propellant for descent) or 13-15t plus a 4.4-tonne crew module for four astronauts in a piloted mode. Most LEV systems (e.g. main engines, attitude control system, avionics, communications) would be similar to the LTV's. The vehicle weighs 5.8t empty; 22.4t fully fueled. It can be stored for up to 30 days on the lunar surface or in lunar orbit. The LEV is powered by four 89 kilonewton-thrust rocket engines (465s Isp).

Lunar Excursion Vehicle lands on the Moon with payload.

Emplacement of the lunar outpost would begin with an unmanned test flight to deliver a small unpressurized rover + equipment necessary to prepare the outpost site and off-load future moonbase payloads. The rover would initially be operated telerobotically from Earth and later be used to transport astronauts over short distances (less than 50km) on the lunar surface. The second unmanned flight would deliver a permanent habitat derived from SS Freedom's habitation module, an airlock, power & thermal control systems and associated support equipment. 

SOURCES:

MENU



Webpages  © 2001-2007 
Blue Knight Productions