Author Topic: Water, atmosphere and life on the Moon (Read 19282 times)

vril-ya · « **Reply #30 on:** March 26, 2016, 03:03:34 AM »

music to listen to while looking at these wonderful moon cities..

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WbjF4KMZ39Q[/youtube]

funbox · « **Reply #31 on:** March 26, 2016, 05:24:54 AM »

Quote from: vril-ya on March 26, 2016, 03:03:34 AM

music to listen to while looking at these wonderful moon cities..

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WbjF4KMZ39Q[/youtube]

shall we ramp up the pace a little

[youtube]BSsfjHCFosw[/youtube]

doomBox

funbox · « **Reply #32 on:** March 26, 2016, 05:50:17 AM »

JLW is still plodding on with his moon observations , I couldn't help but notice some similar shapes on his latest moon footage

[youtube]TOFLKYxaCjU[/youtube]

looks like a bridge over troubled waters to me

funbox

ArMaP · « **Reply #33 on:** March 26, 2016, 06:57:52 AM »

Quote from: vril-ya on March 25, 2016, 04:22:33 PM

because it is fake, crater terrain superimposed over the lake to look like dry basin.

I suppose that's a way to solve the problem, when things do not support your ideas they are fake.

I suppose there's no point in presenting other photos.

ArMaP · « **Reply #34 on:** March 26, 2016, 07:01:00 AM »

Quote from: thorfourwinds on March 25, 2016, 11:19:02 PM

And now you attempt to distance your self from being a MOD on ATS?
lol good luck with that

No, it's their domain, I do not own it.

vril-ya · « **Reply #35 on:** March 26, 2016, 07:14:39 AM »

no, i just prefer the truth over deception. keep your airbrushed fakes for some other thread.

Quote from: ArMaP on March 26, 2016, 06:57:52 AM

I suppose that's a way to solve the problem, when things do not support your ideas they are fake.

I suppose there's no point in presenting other photos.

ArMaP · « **Reply #36 on:** March 26, 2016, 08:24:21 AM »

Quote from: vril-ya on March 26, 2016, 07:14:39 AM

no, i just prefer the truth over deception. keep your airbrushed fakes for some other thread.

A serious question: how do you know what's fake and what's not?

vril-ya · « **Reply #37 on:** March 26, 2016, 08:38:50 AM »

you may call it seeing the obvious (once you've done enough research) and recognizing the deception (that you posted).

Quote from: ArMaP on March 26, 2016, 08:24:21 AM

A serious question: how do you know what's fake and what's not?

ArMaP · « **Reply #38 on:** March 26, 2016, 08:44:52 AM »

Quote from: vril-ya on March 26, 2016, 08:38:50 AM

you may call it seeing the obvious (once you've done enough research) and recognizing the deception (that you posted).

How can someone that is starting to look into this without any preconceived ideas know what to look for?

vril-ya · « **Reply #39 on:** March 26, 2016, 08:59:29 AM »

for me it was a gradual process of discovery, connecting dots, uncovering more evidence etc. it is easier for newcomers to start from here than it was for me. few years ago noone even dared to claim this, since the early contactees who were ridiculed and rejected. now it becomes clear they were, indeed, telling the truth.

Quote from: ArMaP on March 26, 2016, 08:44:52 AM

How can someone that is starting to look into this without any preconceived ideas know what to look for?

A51Watcher · « **Reply #40 on:** March 26, 2016, 04:57:50 PM »

Just curious if you've had a chance to browse the contactee section on Pegasus.

Things don't look good for Adamski's or Meier's evidence.

ArMaP · « **Reply #41 on:** March 26, 2016, 05:05:42 PM »

Quote from: robomont on March 26, 2016, 02:00:42 AM

why cant we just pull out a telescope and know for sure.with all the tech available these days and super clear nights,it should be obvious.
am i missing something?

In this case, Tsiolkovsky crater is on the other side of the Moon, not visible from Earth.

vril-ya · « **Reply #42 on:** March 26, 2016, 08:29:30 PM »

no, but i have a collection of my own contactee ebooks. that is true for meier, who's "plajerans" told him regarding life in SOL system: ""There is nothing living on these planets of either material or spiritual forms". as for adamski, things look exactly as he described including the "big body of water".

Quote from: A51Watcher on March 26, 2016, 04:57:50 PM

Just curious if you've had a chance to browse the contactee section on Pegasus.

Things don't look good for Adamski's or Meier's evidence.

A51Watcher · « **Reply #43 on:** March 26, 2016, 08:34:59 PM »

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W6tMHlHrT0c[/youtube]

A51Watcher · « **Reply #44 on:** March 26, 2016, 11:36:04 PM »

My point being you have some nice photos and an interesting premise, but basing that premise on contactees could turn out to be quicksand.

Personally I would like to see you expand your premise and research, without the need for bringing contactees into it.

Just my 2 cents.

Pegasus Research Consortium

News: