collapse

Author Topic: NASA gives 'official' statement on the Moon hoax...  (Read 3745 times)

Offline zorgon

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19909
  • Gold 879
NASA gives 'official' statement on the Moon hoax...
« on: February 16, 2012, 02:08:48 PM »
This Just In...

NASA gives 'official' statement on the Moon hoax...







Offline rdunk

  • The Roundtable
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3128
  • Gold 389
Re: NASA gives 'official' statement on the Moon hoax...
« Reply #1 on: February 16, 2012, 02:56:10 PM »
And, it looks like NASA used Larry, Curly, and Mo to  "make this official statement"!  ;D

Offline Amaterasu

  • The Roundtable
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6646
  • Gold 275
  • Information Will Free Us
    • T.A.P. - You're It
Re: NASA gives 'official' statement on the Moon hoax...
« Reply #2 on: February 16, 2012, 05:42:56 PM »
LOLOL!  Yup!  That's NASA!

ROFL!
"If the universe is made of mostly Dark Energy...can We use it to run Our cars?"

"If You want peace, take the profit out of war."

Offline WeekendWarrior

  • Fight for truth, fight against suppression of information!
  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 104
  • Gold 7
  • I hate cold..
Re: NASA gives 'official' statement on the Moon hoax...
« Reply #3 on: February 28, 2012, 03:26:39 PM »
   Hahhah! Very good, that says it all  ;D

Offline hobbit

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 755
  • Gold 50
Re: NASA gives 'official' statement on the Moon hoax...
« Reply #4 on: May 31, 2012, 01:07:05 PM »
This will be old hat to You guys, but why are the shadow angles different?????
http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/image/0707/Apollo11EastCrater_panorama.jpg
hobbit

Offline Littleenki

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4007
  • Gold 202
Re: NASA gives 'official' statement on the Moon hoax...
« Reply #5 on: May 31, 2012, 03:02:37 PM »
Buying it hook line and sinker!:)
Le
Hermetically sealed, for your protection

Offline rdunk

  • The Roundtable
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3128
  • Gold 389
Re: NASA gives 'official' statement on the Moon hoax...
« Reply #6 on: May 31, 2012, 03:31:23 PM »
This will be old hat to You guys, but why are the shadow angles different?????
http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/image/0707/Apollo11EastCrater_panorama.jpg
hobbit

Hello hobbit! For me, after looking at you pic, I think that is a good question! Well, that is, unless shadows on the moon don't have to go in the same directions, because of lower gravity, or as "no gravity", as you might say. ;)

To my view, there are three significant shadows near the camera, and they all are going in different angles. That would be the shadow of the photographer, the shadow of the vertical equipment piece of some sort, and the shadow of a rock, just to the right of the equipment piece.

While being no "shadow expert", the angle of any shadow will be directly relative to the light making the shadow. It is my opinion, that this photo possibly depicts proof that there likely are multiple light sources there forming the shadows.

And besides that, in my opinion, the shadow to the far right, which is shown on the far side of the "crater", has some appearance of having been applied. To me, it doesn't look natural, it seems to come too far out at the end of it, and one can see some below the crater edge behind it on the left end. With all of this "light". there probably should not be much shadow there anyway.

JMHO!

Offline Amaterasu

  • The Roundtable
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6646
  • Gold 275
  • Information Will Free Us
    • T.A.P. - You're It
Re: NASA gives 'official' statement on the Moon hoax...
« Reply #7 on: May 31, 2012, 04:12:22 PM »
Yeah.  Those shadows are ALL wrong if the SUN was the source!  (Well, one could be correct but the rest...)   That crater look as if the sun is just off camera to the right, and the shadow of the man looks like it is nearly behind Him, and the equipment shadow looks like it's somewhere in between...

"If the universe is made of mostly Dark Energy...can We use it to run Our cars?"

"If You want peace, take the profit out of war."

deuem

  • Guest
Re: NASA gives 'official' statement on the Moon hoax...
« Reply #8 on: June 01, 2012, 01:48:48 AM »
Hello hobbit! For me, after looking at you pic, I think that is a good question! Well, that is, unless shadows on the moon don't have to go in the same directions, because of lower gravity, or as "no gravity", as you might say. ;)

To my view, there are three significant shadows near the camera, and they all are going in different angles. That would be the shadow of the photographer, the shadow of the vertical equipment piece of some sort, and the shadow of a rock, just to the right of the equipment piece.

While being no "shadow expert", the angle of any shadow will be directly relative to the light making the shadow. It is my opinion, that this photo possibly depicts proof that there likely are multiple light sources there forming the shadows.

And besides that, in my opinion, the shadow to the far right, which is shown on the far side of the "crater", has some appearance of having been applied. To me, it doesn't look natural, it seems to come too far out at the end of it, and one can see some below the crater edge behind it on the left end. With all of this "light". there probably should not be much shadow there anyway.

JMHO!

Ok, I also have an opinion on this one:  If you take a pencil, stand it up straight in the ground and then place another one right next to it on an angle you will get one straight shadow and one angled shadow even from 1 light. If you place them parallel next to each other you get parallel shadows. You can do this test at home with 2 pencils.
 
I have been looking at shadows for years now and I still cant prove a second light source from them, just different angles from the object that cast the shadows. A shadow is a projection from the angle and height, not just the height.
 
If we had 2 lights we should get 4 shadows from the 2 pencils or hobbits astronaut and equipment. If the light is strong enough to make 1 shadow it should be strong enough to make 2. 4 total.
 
Saying all that, If you have been following my Deuem program, you might see how it follows light and is very good with sun or flash light. I have done many moon photos and have found 1 source or up to 3 sources. But still the shadows were OK. Meaning it looks like reflective light and not an intense source.  If anyone wants to try, drop a photo in my thread or here and I will run it. I don't want to derail the thought of this thread.
 
Deuem

bobathome

  • Guest
Re: NASA gives 'official' statement on the Moon hoax...
« Reply #9 on: June 01, 2012, 09:46:54 PM »
When a Countries Truth is attacked,,
they call it Propaganda.
Too sway from the Truth,,
 Don't let them Sway u out of this one.
 An attack on a cultures ICONS,,
is still a very personal attack,,
too think in 3 years there could be,,only
the MYTH of APOLLO.
then 5 years.
never happened.
We this generation, are the last surviving witness's of this Historic Event,,
i ask,,dont let it die.


 


Wal-Mart.com USA, LLC
affiliate_link
Free Click Tracking
Wal-Mart.com USA, LLC

* Recent Posts

Re: More Jobs Down the Drain Sam's Club Closed 63 Stores today by Littleenki
[Today at 12:58:13 PM]


Re: 411 by Gigas
[Today at 12:40:19 PM]


Re: More Jobs Down the Drain Sam's Club Closed 63 Stores today by Gigas
[Today at 12:14:07 PM]


Re: Fake Casino Hides Massive Underground Construction of Super Secret Subway... by Gigas
[Today at 11:53:15 AM]


Re: Penney for your thoughts by The Seeker
[Today at 11:34:56 AM]


Re: Penney for your thoughts by micjer
[Today at 11:07:32 AM]


Penney for your thoughts by Sgt.Rocknroll
[Today at 04:26:12 AM]


Re: HAPPY BIRTHDAY, Sarge by Sgt.Rocknroll
[Today at 03:43:49 AM]


Re: HAPPY BIRTHDAY, Sarge by Smilingtree
[January 16, 2018, 06:56:20 PM]


Re: HAPPY BIRTHDAY, Sarge by thorfourwinds
[January 16, 2018, 05:48:49 PM]


Re: HAPPY BIRTHDAY, Sarge by Sgt.Rocknroll
[January 16, 2018, 04:26:41 PM]


Re: HAPPY BIRTHDAY, Sarge by ArMaP
[January 16, 2018, 07:07:50 AM]


HAPPY BIRTHDAY, Sarge by The Seeker
[January 16, 2018, 05:40:14 AM]


Re: Music You Love by ArMaP
[January 15, 2018, 02:13:35 PM]


Re: Oprah Winfrey for president: a wild idea that just got dramatically more real by micjer
[January 15, 2018, 12:24:47 PM]


Re: Oprah Winfrey for president: a wild idea that just got dramatically more real by Somamech
[January 15, 2018, 08:22:57 AM]


Re: The Kennedy Detail: JFK's Secret Service Agents Break Their Silence by A51Watcher
[January 14, 2018, 01:03:50 PM]


Re: Oprah Winfrey for president: a wild idea that just got dramatically more real by petrus4
[January 14, 2018, 11:52:41 AM]


Re: The Kennedy Detail: JFK's Secret Service Agents Break Their Silence by spacemaverick
[January 13, 2018, 07:57:56 PM]


Re: Oprah Winfrey for president: a wild idea that just got dramatically more real by Shasta56
[January 13, 2018, 06:11:48 PM]