Author Topic: Malaysia flight 370 Where is it? (Read 166787 times)

Sgt.Rocknroll · « **Reply #1125 on:** September 04, 2018, 09:54:45 AM »

Per my earlier post about NG Show Drain the Oceans Flight MH370.
I'll be posting the show in two parts. As soon as I finish editing it and uploading it to youtube. (had to break it into two parts).
Explains a lot I did not know.

spacemaverick · « **Reply #1126 on:** September 04, 2018, 12:17:23 PM »

Quote from: Sgt.Rocknroll on September 04, 2018, 09:54:45 AM

Per my earlier post about NG Show Drain the Oceans Flight MH370.
I'll be posting the show in two parts. As soon as I finish editing it and uploading it to youtube. (had to break it into two parts).
Explains a lot I did not know.

I am looking forward to it. What's the link to your channel?

Sgt.Rocknroll · « **Reply #1127 on:** September 04, 2018, 07:04:31 PM »

Well it took me a little longer to get the editing right and I had to break it up in four parts instead of two.
For those that are blocked from viewing these because of copyright issues in your native countries, send me a PM with your email address and I'll try and email the .mp4 files I have so you can view them.

Please try and watch the whole thing before commenting.

Part 1

Part 2

Part 3

Part 4

astr0144 · « **Reply #1128 on:** September 05, 2018, 05:11:27 AM »

Thanks for posting....So this is the video that related to drained ocean bottom on the National Geographic website you referred to Sgt !

I think on an initial view of the video/s. It seems impressive...

I assume that there does seem to show information and content that I dont think has been documented.

To try to be more specific.. it will be a case of Watching the videos... Verses trying to recall the past facts...but from an initial view based on trying to recall the basic facts so far from memory..I get the impression that there is quite a lot of content and information shown that has not as yet been posted in this thread... In which much of it is not generally known, if what the videos show is realistic.

The main part being how they claim to have worked out its final last directon up until it ran out of fuel and crashed much further South and West within the Indian Ocean than most could ever had been imagined...well away west from the likes of Malaysia ,Indonisia or Austrailia area locations .

What ever technology that they had used, that the general public was not aware of.
Now it seems that they have reduced it down to a much smaller area to determine where the crashed aircraft is now suggested to be...they have stilll not found it..

They claim to have found different parts of the aircraft... in various locations...
which is still puzzling to some degree... but they claim the tides have done that...
and some of these parts are in locations of the earlier search areas..which is hundreds or thousands of miles apart from where they suggest the new area zones to be when the aircraft finally crashed...

and yet they are saying the plane did not break up until it had ran out of fuel and crashed ..and was then within a new unexpected location...

The suggested new area zone, showed several potential points where they think the crash site could be... and along those areas.. they also show what seems to be possible differing tidal activities that could vary in how any wreckage maybe effected and what direction that it may then take in the future days after the plane crashed.....

It may also be a case... differing parts (due to weight, materials and shape and wind and tide effects on them) could still go in differing directions...but its hard to believe some ended up suggested to be so far apart..

So some parts at the moment, I am still questioning ?

But it does seem to show a LOT of things that I think most of us would not be aware about..and the technology is impressive in the way that it can show the suggested terrain under the seas within a drained ocean !

I still question the Black Box and why that it has not been possible to have pin pointed that by modern technology with in a short time period (as it suggested the Battery in it only would last a few days)..be it some sort of Earth based radar or by satellite from space..

I think these days with such techology we now have..GPS and that type of thing... that we could detect something as large as an aircraft any where on the planet. even if it crashed in the ocean..

Or are they suggesting that signals could be blocked if the aircraft sank down to say a steep sided type valley under the ocean ! that signals would not then become detectable.

micjer · « **Reply #1129 on:** September 05, 2018, 05:35:23 AM »

Very good summary .

This is am interesting video also. More to think about.

Sgt.Rocknroll · « **Reply #1130 on:** September 05, 2018, 06:07:32 AM »

astr0144 - I think the videos explain it very well as far as the drift of debris is concerned. And some of the tools they ended up using such as the tidal buoys to determine the drift of debris (remember two major storms went through the area) and the nuclear detection stations just west of Australia that would never have been considered at the time of the initial search leads credence to the suggested final location.

I also found it amazing that with the technology we have today, that there are still areas, in the deep oceans that have never been mapped and they have no idea of what the terrain is comprised of.

a real needle in a hay stack!..

spacemaverick · « **Reply #1131 on:** September 05, 2018, 09:38:37 AM »

Quote from: Sgt.Rocknroll on September 05, 2018, 06:07:32 AM

astr0144 - I think the videos explain it very well as far as the drift of debris is concerned. And some of the tools they ended up using such as the tidal buoys to determine the drift of debris (remember two major storms went through the area) and the nuclear detection stations just west of Australia that would never have been considered at the time of the initial search leads credence to the suggested final location.

I also found it amazing that with the technology we have today, that there are still areas, in the deep oceans that have never been mapped and they have no idea of what the terrain is comprised of.

a real needle in a hay stack!..

I watched the videos and there is so much more information than what I was able to obtain. It is a shame that the videos are not allowed in the USA based on copyright. Thanks for sending them to me. Maybe if I dig enough I can find a way of posting them here in the USA giving you credit of course.

Sgt.Rocknroll · « **Reply #1132 on:** September 05, 2018, 09:55:15 AM »

Hey all I did was copy it and edited it. Don’t need any credit.
It was just everything I’ve seen here didn’t have all the info the videos did.

spacemaverick · « **Reply #1133 on:** September 05, 2018, 10:09:41 AM »

They are socked full of information that I had not seen before....thanks

astr0144 · « **Reply #1134 on:** September 05, 2018, 01:57:51 PM »

Hi Sgt,

yes overall it does explain a lot...in good detail.. I agree !

One point that we still are unsure about thou... is was it a definate hijack and who was involved.. or is there some other reason behind it...

either way its still such a mystery to allow to crash on the basis of running out of fuel..

and it went a long way to the south west of the Indian ocean...

Quote from: Sgt.Rocknroll on September 05, 2018, 06:07:32 AM

astr0144 - I think the videos explain it very well as far as the drift of debris is concerned. And some of the tools they ended up using such as the tidal buoys to determine the drift of debris (remember two major storms went through the area) and the nuclear detection stations just west of Australia that would never have been considered at the time of the initial search leads credence to the suggested final location.

I also found it amazing that with the technology we have today, that there are still areas, in the deep oceans that have never been mapped and they have no idea of what the terrain is comprised of.

a real needle in a hay stack!..

spacemaverick · « **Reply #1135 on:** January 18, 2019, 09:36:42 AM »

This new news has not been positively confirmed but here is the link to the article regarding MH 370. One error...Clarion Project said MH 380 and in the article MH 370. You be the judge.

A Malaysian official takes a picture of debris found by a fisherman. The debris was believed to be from the Malaysian Airlines flight 370 which disappeared in March 2014 with 239 people on board. (Photo: TUWAEDANIYA MERINGING/AFP/Getty Images)

http://clarionproject.org/239-killed-on-plane-to-prevent-repeat-of-9-11/?fbclid=IwAR2GUIXsacm5vFF2DFYsXbEZzZa307dsxMUYh6vP7ahzb1CKPIuG_fSRD_0

Click on the link for the whole story. Credit to the Clarion Project.

Additional information link below

http://clarionproject.org/two-islamist-terror-groups-chief-suspects-airplane-crash/

robomont · « **Reply #1136 on:** January 18, 2019, 07:51:44 PM »

not buying it spacemaverick.there was supposedly 22austin company employees on board.owned some high tech.
the plane was visually seen going down in the indian ocean by multiple witnesses.obamas wife and kids were scheduled to visit china on that day.three nukes had gone missing and a pallet of lithium batteries were on board.nuke plus lithium equals thermal nuke.

this was obama and china trying to start ww 3.