A little creepy

[Amaterasu]

You might have some success by contacting that site,
check the date of entry on it. Also, run a check on your
term in another Google search field, you may be as shocked
and worse. Search under 'discussions'.

 As it is, your term is coming up clear, what is odd that the
 paragraph after is the bad OCR. It is indeed stange, but then
 again google is full of wierd stuff.

Google may be filled with "weird" stuff, but that specific term, coined by Me, to be showing up in that context - "pluchild-problem?" - is beyond Google just being weird.  "Triumphant greed?"  "...pressing for solutocracy...?"

I am certain there is a code there.

As for checking dates...  Not sure how I would do that.  I suppose I could contact Them - that might be interesting.  I did look at page info to discover that the file had been modified TODAY:



[shrug]  I have screen shots from yesterday, and will see what has changed - if anything...

[Sinny]

I'm looking forward to the mystery being solved.

[Amaterasu]

Well, I filled out a contact form asking about the material.  We'll see.

[Amaterasu]

Mystery solved!  LOL!

It IS an OCR scan of a book with two columns (thus the sense that the content was from different sources).  And it just worked out randomly that "solutocracy" was the result:



And with the OCR line-read indicated:



I guess I'm just paranoid.  [smile]

[ArMaP]

It IS an OCR scan of a book with two columns (thus the sense that the content was from different sources).  And it just worked out randomly that "solutocracy" was the result:

I guess I'm just paranoid.  [smile]

We finally agree in something. 

[ArMaP]

I did look at page info to discover that the file had been modified TODAY:

Is that the time when you looked at the page? I think that's what Firefox shows.

[Amaterasu]

Nope.  I looked at about 2ish PM.

[zorgon]

I thought to do a search for "solutocracy" and ran it, getting a surprising 1,610 results.  The whole page was postings by Me, as i expected, but down at the bottom of the first page was this:



Dunno.  AnyOne here with a clue?

Well that article is now #6  likely because  you posting that link here and everyone checking it out bumped it higher

[robomont]

I know that first link i clicked on gave me a wall of code .no words at all .with my droid.

[zorgon]

Mystery solved!  LOL!

Robots  LOL 

 

I guess I'm just paranoid.  [smile]

True that but dang making up new words and spamming them  I would be paranoid too

[Amaterasu]

Robots  LOL 

 

True that but dang making up new words and spamming them  I would be paranoid too

It's not spam by virtue of the virtue.  [smile]  I seek no monetary gain, I do not sneak in malware, and I offer it from the heart.  I am trying to save Humans from the NWO, which, regardless of My paranoid tendencies, is real and WILL emerge again even if We "win" this time - unless We eliminate the control mechanism once and for all.

And coming up with a governance system which We have never seen before to go with the abundance We have never seen before requires to be called SOMETHING.  If I called it "peanuts," or "crustacean," or "theocracy," or any word already taken, I'm bound to have issues communicating, don't You think, z?

So...  The best descriptor in the standard format is what I chose.

You see a problem in any of the above?

As for OCR ("robots"), there is a far cry from the simple, clearly defined tasks We might need robots for because not enough People want to do them, and deciphering wide-ranging text - "reading," in other words.

And I bet the "reading" skills will improve as Those of Us who love to work on such problems do so.  We Humans are problem-solvers, after all...seems a solutocracy is just what the universe ordered.