collapse

Author Topic: "Geoengineering" - A Conclusive Photo?  (Read 11416 times)

Offline Somamech

  • Order of the Mystic Star
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3344
  • Gold 337
Re: "Geoengineering" - A Conclusive Photo?
« Reply #30 on: August 18, 2013, 11:24:56 AM »
I wonder where I can get Mass spec reader for cheap from a hardware store BTS :D

Offline ArMaP

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9998
  • Gold 751
Re: "Geoengineering" - A Conclusive Photo?
« Reply #31 on: August 18, 2013, 11:55:45 AM »
On the same token though, people must think as to why you will not get that DSTO doc :P
That document is available on the Internet Archive:)

sky otter

  • Guest
Re: "Geoengineering" - A Conclusive Photo?
« Reply #32 on: August 18, 2013, 12:26:09 PM »


oh sigh
if pimander was here he'd be pulling his hair out at this off topic
(does anyone know where he went?)

but ArMaP
my post was responding to this comment you made about this place being too nice..

This forum is starting to look more like Facebook, where people can only give "likes", than a forum, specially a forum for researchers. 

Offline Amaterasu

  • The Roundtable
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6646
  • Gold 275
  • Information Will Free Us
    • T.A.P. - You're It
Re: "Geoengineering" - A Conclusive Photo?
« Reply #33 on: August 18, 2013, 12:50:45 PM »
Well, I was going to ask some more questions, but I guess it would be pointless.

This forum is starting to look more like Facebook, where people can only give "likes", than a forum, specially a forum for researchers.  :(

Darlin', I just didn't want to be arguing with You.  [smile]  It's not so important that My view be accepted by anyOne else so...  I agreed with You.  You can't argue with someOne who is agreeing with You.

Just sayin'.
"If the universe is made of mostly Dark Energy...can We use it to run Our cars?"

"If You want peace, take the profit out of war."

Offline ArMaP

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9998
  • Gold 751
Re: "Geoengineering" - A Conclusive Photo?
« Reply #34 on: August 18, 2013, 12:56:12 PM »
if pimander was here he'd be pulling his hair out at this off topic
I almost am myself, so I will answer in a message. :)

Quote
(does anyone know where he went?)
No, as far as I know he just disappeared. :(

Offline ArMaP

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9998
  • Gold 751
Re: "Geoengineering" - A Conclusive Photo?
« Reply #35 on: August 18, 2013, 12:58:26 PM »
Darlin', I just didn't want to be arguing with You.  [smile]  It's not so important that My view be accepted by anyOne else so...  I agreed with You.  You can't argue with someOne who is agreeing with You.

Just sayin'.
OK, then it means I misunderstood your "Whatever" at the beginning of the post.

Sorry.  :(

Offline zorgon

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19931
  • Gold 879
Re: "Geoengineering" - A Conclusive Photo?
« Reply #36 on: August 18, 2013, 01:56:12 PM »
We can look up, and observe. We can research and find.

SEEK AND YE SHALL FIND THAT SHALL BE THE WHOLE OF THE LAW

Since we are supposed to be a RESEARCH forum... we should not so easily fall into the trap of EVERYTHING IS AN EVIL CHEMTRAIL

What Sarg said is true....

They are attempting to come up with solutions to block the sun, whether CME or just the extra radiation its putting out...

Here are some facts...

Giant breach in the Earths magnetic field....
Fish getting sunburned...
Extreme temperatures and weather worldwide... its still 108F in Vegas today
Ice Age is imminent according to Vostok ice core samples...  Those mastadons Sarg mentions were frozen still eating their last meal

Whether or not they can prevent it is open for debate.. but THAT is what they are trying to do.  HAARP has the ability, but ONLY with the network of other similar stations around the world. to put up a planetary shield  IN THEORY as it hasn't been fully tested yet.  Sure the shield has military uses as a missile defense shield (not a bad thing either)  Seeding the upper atmosphere and LEO with certain materials that can be activated by HAARP can create a shield

I know the chemtrail crowd will continue to say its all evil and meant to wipe out 80% of the population... but that hasn't happened yet and if they wanted that it would be far cheaper to just drop a genetically modified virus into the drinking water :P

Robomont is right...

A few months back they flew the grid pattern over Las Vegas....

It was NOT the commercial airliners because those you could see and had no contrails at all that day... (THIS is a BIG CLUE because if the regular planes made no normal contrails that day then the other ones MUST not be contrails :P )

At about 2 pm they started  I counted about 6 high flying very fast planes laying out the grid.  It was a typical checkerboard  and was done in under an hour.

By 5 pm these trails had expanded to fill in the whole sky with a thin cloud layer.

The next day was gray and overcast and a LOT cooler (down from 110 to around 89-92)  the day after we had RAIN all day heavy to light steady DRIZZLE   Drizzle is NOT normal to Las Vegas... When we do get rain. (rarely) its a sudden downpour that creates flash floods and is soon over and dried up.  But after that grid we had three days of overcast and rain and cooler temps....

And we are still here to talk about it :P

ArMap is right

The picture I posted is not contrails... THIS is what I mean by RESEARCH...

A simple Google image search would have given the answer :P

Look closely at the closeup.  the SMOKE is coming from three nozzles on each wing. Yes it is SMOKE. This is a NASA plane doing VORTEX studies and using the same smoke that sky writers use. 



Not contrails, not CHEMTRAILS but smoke trails :P You could argue that 'smoke' is technically a chemical but then so is water vapor :P  That is why the term Chemtrail is so wishy washy and gets treated as wacko :D

Most chemtrail supporters will look at ANY trail and say Yup  Evil Chemtrails

We are supposed to be better here :P

If you cannot separate the difference, we won't be taken seriously



Quote
We are waiting for an admission.
The CIA is on it....

Well there is hope... they DID just admit Area 51 is real :P

Offline zorgon

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19931
  • Gold 879
Re: "Geoengineering" - A Conclusive Photo?
« Reply #37 on: August 18, 2013, 02:02:36 PM »
No, as far as I know he just disappeared. :(

No reply to emails either  and we have no other way to contact him

What Pegasus needs is a PR person that can write emails and make phone calls to find out what happens to people.

If they decide to quit, fine... but we never know if someone took ill or died.

I had a bellydancer once... she was one of our top dancers real promise... One day she just vanished. About a year later we found her.  She was one of those people who had gotten an ANTHRAX letter. It was rough on her and she didn't want to be seen in public much less her friends.  She is fine now but just shows what can happen

Another guild member just vanished... This was in the first year of our guild in the 90's  Last year I got an email from Ireland. Seems her parents had died in a car crash and she just fell off the earth.  She looked for me by name and found me  Is now married and living in Ireland

Offline robomont

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4305
  • Gold 212
Re: "Geoengineering" - A Conclusive Photo?
« Reply #38 on: August 18, 2013, 02:19:00 PM »
i saw one of those swirlies a few months back.couldnt get a pic.now i know.also thankyou zorgon for the vindication on the checkerboard.my only worry is the nanoparticles.

i think ttbrown did some rearch into airisolized ionized particles.

i kinda agree w zorgon on the iceage thing.we may be just holding back the inevitable.those mastodons were flash froze.think of the cold front that did that.it would overwhelm cities in mere minutes.pipes breaking everywhere.cars frozen in placepower poles covered in ice crashing and shorting.doors freezing shut.roofs collapsing from snow and ice.or just my imagination.
ive never been much for rules.
being me has its priviledges.

Dumbledore

sky otter

  • Guest
Re: "Geoengineering" - A Conclusive Photo?
« Reply #39 on: August 18, 2013, 02:28:18 PM »


add to your list that they caught an arctic shark in the gulf of mexico this week
http://www.nbcnews.com/science/shark-tale-12-foot-arctic-predator-caught-warm-gulf-mexico-6C10936328

i have said for years now..what is it they don't want us to see?
good.?  bad?..or otherwise..?

there is also a long thread about the dropping of colored stuff to track the wind/gulf stream

and i agree not everything secret is bad...the reasons for some of the stuff would probably scare the begeebers outta most  of the public..that's if they even noticed..

perhaps all the supposed 'camps' are prep for a real posible disaster..meteor or other
i have always felt that these things have a grain of truth somewhere in the story
so maybe...just maybe nibiru is a possiblilty and the  smoke in the sky is for more info to make better plans

call me pollyanna if you must but i would much rather look for a good reason than an evil one

and sorry for the disruption earlier..i ask armap to delete it..so if it dissappears you'll know why ;D

sky otter

  • Guest
Re: "Geoengineering" - A Conclusive Photo?
« Reply #40 on: August 18, 2013, 02:50:26 PM »
ok that search feature is more menace than help..got choked and tossed
grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr


anyway i can't find the link on here to it  but the name was

nasa jet stream study...
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/sunearth/missions/atrex-nightlight.html

Offline ArMaP

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9998
  • Gold 751
Re: "Geoengineering" - A Conclusive Photo?
« Reply #41 on: August 18, 2013, 03:54:20 PM »
It was NOT the commercial airliners because those you could see and had no contrails at all that day... (THIS is a BIG CLUE because if the regular planes made no normal contrails that day then the other ones MUST not be contrails :P )
There are some sites that show the commercial flights, another clue would be an aeroplane that doesn't appear in the lists.

Here in Portugal we rarely see contrails.

Offline Amaterasu

  • The Roundtable
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6646
  • Gold 275
  • Information Will Free Us
    • T.A.P. - You're It
Re: "Geoengineering" - A Conclusive Photo?
« Reply #42 on: August 18, 2013, 04:41:28 PM »
OK, then it means I misunderstood your "Whatever" at the beginning of the post.

Sorry.  :(

Sarright.  [smile]
"If the universe is made of mostly Dark Energy...can We use it to run Our cars?"

"If You want peace, take the profit out of war."

Offline ArMaP

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9998
  • Gold 751
Re: "Geoengineering" - A Conclusive Photo?
« Reply #43 on: August 18, 2013, 04:48:21 PM »
Sarright.  [smile]
That is something that took me some seconds to try to understand what it meant, and I'm not sure that I did. :)

Offline Amaterasu

  • The Roundtable
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6646
  • Gold 275
  • Information Will Free Us
    • T.A.P. - You're It
Re: "Geoengineering" - A Conclusive Photo?
« Reply #44 on: August 18, 2013, 04:51:24 PM »
They are attempting to come up with solutions to block the sun, whether CME or just the extra radiation its putting out...

Regardless of what any one of Those who are doing this think They are doing this for, there are several issues:

No One ASKED Us if We agreed to the plan

Nano-aluminum, barium, & strontium are UNnatural and are clearly causing stress in the environment and in Human health.

"If the universe is made of mostly Dark Energy...can We use it to run Our cars?"

"If You want peace, take the profit out of war."

 


Wal-Mart.com USA, LLC
affiliate_link
Free Click Tracking
Wal-Mart.com USA, LLC

* Recent Posts

Australien Skies 2 - Exclusive Premiere by thorfourwinds
[Today at 10:10:11 PM]


Re: The Question We Should Be Asking by robomont
[Today at 08:21:05 PM]


Re: The Question We Should Be Asking by petrus4
[Today at 05:10:21 PM]


Re: The Question We Should Be Asking by Ellirium113
[Today at 04:10:16 PM]


Re: The Question We Should Be Asking by ArMaP
[Today at 01:52:22 PM]


Re: The Question We Should Be Asking by space otter
[Today at 07:11:59 AM]


Re: The Question We Should Be Asking by Eighthman
[Today at 05:53:51 AM]


Re: The Question We Should Be Asking by ArMaP
[February 19, 2018, 06:54:51 PM]


Re: The Question We Should Be Asking by robomont
[February 19, 2018, 06:28:01 PM]


Re: The Question We Should Be Asking by ArMaP
[February 19, 2018, 05:44:09 PM]


Re: The Question We Should Be Asking by robomont
[February 19, 2018, 03:28:14 PM]


Re: The Question We Should Be Asking by ArMaP
[February 19, 2018, 03:05:34 PM]


Re: The Question We Should Be Asking by robomont
[February 19, 2018, 02:35:45 PM]


Re: The Question We Should Be Asking by ArMaP
[February 19, 2018, 01:51:36 PM]


Re: The Question We Should Be Asking by petrus4
[February 19, 2018, 11:33:01 AM]


Re: The Question We Should Be Asking by Irene
[February 19, 2018, 11:12:13 AM]


Re: The Question We Should Be Asking by petrus4
[February 19, 2018, 08:20:35 AM]


Re: Mandalay: The biggest shooting since Columbine. by The Seeker
[February 18, 2018, 08:48:25 PM]


Re: Mandalay: The biggest shooting since Columbine. by spacemaverick
[February 18, 2018, 02:40:59 PM]


Re: Mandalay: The biggest shooting since Columbine. by The Seeker
[February 18, 2018, 02:31:52 PM]