collapse

Author Topic: "Geoengineering" - A Conclusive Photo?  (Read 11414 times)

Offline zorgon

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19931
  • Gold 879
Re: "Geoengineering" - A Conclusive Photo?
« Reply #15 on: August 17, 2013, 06:43:39 PM »
Here is the close up  in case of doubt :P

And no its not chemtrails, just smoke LOL


Offline Amaterasu

  • The Roundtable
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6646
  • Gold 275
  • Information Will Free Us
    • T.A.P. - You're It
Re: "Geoengineering" - A Conclusive Photo?
« Reply #16 on: August 17, 2013, 06:46:55 PM »
I will still contend that the OP pic IS of chemtrailing.  It has the classic aspects that water vapor does not duplicate.

Nice pic You got there, z.  Yeah...  You have one too.
"If the universe is made of mostly Dark Energy...can We use it to run Our cars?"

"If You want peace, take the profit out of war."

sky otter

  • Guest
Re: "Geoengineering" - A Conclusive Photo?
« Reply #17 on: August 17, 2013, 07:07:54 PM »

just getting here and got this far

That's OK, I'm a fan of people learning by themselves, I just like to speed up the process when I can.

gold for ArMaP...luv his sense of fun


and now i'm this far

Conclusive of WHAT? 

and gold for the big Z
cause that was my question too

hey this givin gold is kinda cool..
but i can only do one gold at a time
not heaps like the Z does..stupid things says i hafta wait a hour
geeeeeeeeeeeze
« Last Edit: August 17, 2013, 07:12:25 PM by sky otter »

Offline zorgon

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19931
  • Gold 879
Re: "Geoengineering" - A Conclusive Photo?
« Reply #18 on: August 17, 2013, 07:16:50 PM »
not heaps like the Z does..stupid things says i hafta wait a hour

yeah I think I can remove that time limit :D

sky otter

  • Guest
Re: "Geoengineering" - A Conclusive Photo?
« Reply #19 on: August 17, 2013, 07:18:27 PM »


and finally a nice gold for amy...for saying we are being geoengineering

cause we are

or maybe
groomed

or

modified


or
yeah you get it

 ;D

Offline Amaterasu

  • The Roundtable
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6646
  • Gold 275
  • Information Will Free Us
    • T.A.P. - You're It
Re: "Geoengineering" - A Conclusive Photo?
« Reply #20 on: August 17, 2013, 07:32:10 PM »
Thank You, sky.  [smile]

Yes...  SOMETHING is surely afoot.
"If the universe is made of mostly Dark Energy...can We use it to run Our cars?"

"If You want peace, take the profit out of war."

Offline Sgt.Rocknroll

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2090
  • Gold 320
  • ROCK On!
    • Sgt. Rocknroll
Re: "Geoengineering" - A Conclusive Photo?
« Reply #21 on: August 17, 2013, 08:43:43 PM »
I think they're seeding the atmosphere to protect us from the giant Cme that seems to happen every 13 thousand years are so. No more mastodons & wooly mammoths. They were taken out by the last one. ;D
Or it could be that giant quasar pulse from deep space.????
Non nobis, Domine, non nobis, sed nomini Tuo da gloriam

Offline ArMaP

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9996
  • Gold 751
Re: "Geoengineering" - A Conclusive Photo?
« Reply #22 on: August 18, 2013, 05:21:32 AM »
Whatever, dear ArMaP.  You're right.
Well, I was going to ask some more questions, but I guess it would be pointless.

This forum is starting to look more like Facebook, where people can only give "likes", than a forum, specially a forum for researchers.  :(

Offline ArMaP

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9996
  • Gold 751
Re: "Geoengineering" - A Conclusive Photo?
« Reply #23 on: August 18, 2013, 05:35:18 AM »
Here is the close up  in case of doubt :P

And no its not chemtrails, just smoke LOL


The trails on the tip of the wings make a sharp turn, showing that it's not an aerodynamic event but it's something being affected by aerodynamics.

It also looks too blueish to be vapour, but I have been watching water vapour for only 50 years, so I may be wrong.  :P

Offline robomont

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4304
  • Gold 212
Re: "Geoengineering" - A Conclusive Photo?
« Reply #24 on: August 18, 2013, 05:59:16 AM »
the best way i know to prove chemtrails exist is to follow them.if a storm is created from them then it usually only takes a couple of days.joplin got checkerboards and the town north east of them got hit the next night.you could see the checkerboards in joplin the next morning when reporters are interviewing folks in joplin .funny and sad.i saw the checker boards that hit joplin.i saw them in ne texas headed toward missouri the day before.they were almost perfect squares.evenly spaced.
ive never been much for rules.
being me has its priviledges.

Dumbledore

sky otter

  • Guest
Re: "Geoengineering" - A Conclusive Photo?
« Reply #25 on: August 18, 2013, 10:45:53 AM »


well holy heck there ArMap.. if i would have known you liked it rough and nasty i wouldn't have tossed gold at  your humor

maybe from now on i should just not laugh at your posts..

i think you can accomplish more without the mean nasties ..you just don't waste all that time
but if you need to be poked ..i'm sure someone will step up for you on that

here's your sign












heh heh heh  :P

Offline ArMaP

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9996
  • Gold 751
Re: "Geoengineering" - A Conclusive Photo?
« Reply #26 on: August 18, 2013, 10:51:57 AM »
Sorry, sky otter, I don't understand what you mean by that. :(

Offline Somamech

  • Order of the Mystic Star
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3344
  • Gold 337
Re: "Geoengineering" - A Conclusive Photo?
« Reply #27 on: August 18, 2013, 10:58:09 AM »
Try and drag this Paper up ;)

Now People want a fence to sit on right ?  A Cloak or Dagger so to speak ;)

Back in The Day

Daytime observations of lower thermospheric wind profiles at Woomera

Abstract

Profiles of the daytime wind in the lower thermosphere, determined by observing the release of lithium vapour from a rocket, are presented. The observed profiles are compared with predicted tidal winds. The influence of thermospheric winds on ionisation distribution is discussed in relation to simultaneously observed ionospheric parameters. An outline is given of the analysis of the data obtained from the daytime lithium scanners, particular attention being given to problems which arise in the data analysis

SOURCE:

http://www.dsto.defence.gov.au/publications/scientific_record.php?record=9394

Offline Somamech

  • Order of the Mystic Star
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3344
  • Gold 337
Re: "Geoengineering" - A Conclusive Photo?
« Reply #28 on: August 18, 2013, 11:01:53 AM »
Now if I was sinisiter I am sure it would be possible to release my farts into the airway's. 

The fact is is that I am not that sinister, and relise other's may not be as bad as what is made out to be through group think...

On the same token though, people must think as to why you will not get that DSTO doc :P


Offline burntheships

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2759
  • Gold 268
Re: "Geoengineering" - A Conclusive Photo?
« Reply #29 on: August 18, 2013, 11:18:18 AM »
Gold for Soma.

We can look up, and observe. We can research and find.
We are waiting for an admission.

The CIA is on it..... ;)
"This is the Documentary Channel"
- Zorgon

 


Wal-Mart.com USA, LLC
affiliate_link
Free Click Tracking
Wal-Mart.com USA, LLC

* Recent Posts

Re: The Question We Should Be Asking by Eighthman
[Today at 05:53:51 AM]


Re: The Question We Should Be Asking by ArMaP
[February 19, 2018, 06:54:51 PM]


Re: The Question We Should Be Asking by robomont
[February 19, 2018, 06:28:01 PM]


Re: The Question We Should Be Asking by ArMaP
[February 19, 2018, 05:44:09 PM]


Re: The Question We Should Be Asking by robomont
[February 19, 2018, 03:28:14 PM]


Re: The Question We Should Be Asking by ArMaP
[February 19, 2018, 03:05:34 PM]


Re: The Question We Should Be Asking by robomont
[February 19, 2018, 02:35:45 PM]


Re: The Question We Should Be Asking by ArMaP
[February 19, 2018, 01:51:36 PM]


Re: The Question We Should Be Asking by petrus4
[February 19, 2018, 11:33:01 AM]


Re: The Question We Should Be Asking by Irene
[February 19, 2018, 11:12:13 AM]


Re: The Question We Should Be Asking by petrus4
[February 19, 2018, 08:20:35 AM]


Re: Mandalay: The biggest shooting since Columbine. by The Seeker
[February 18, 2018, 08:48:25 PM]


Re: Mandalay: The biggest shooting since Columbine. by spacemaverick
[February 18, 2018, 02:40:59 PM]


Re: Mandalay: The biggest shooting since Columbine. by The Seeker
[February 18, 2018, 02:31:52 PM]


Re: Mandalay: The biggest shooting since Columbine. by spacemaverick
[February 18, 2018, 01:20:45 PM]


The Question We Should Be Asking by Eighthman
[February 18, 2018, 01:08:19 PM]


Re: Mandalay: The biggest shooting since Columbine. by ArMaP
[February 18, 2018, 11:50:28 AM]


Re: Mandalay: The biggest shooting since Columbine. by petrus4
[February 18, 2018, 08:48:05 AM]


Re: Mandalay: The biggest shooting since Columbine. by ArMaP
[February 18, 2018, 06:59:15 AM]


Re: fake news - live by ArMaP
[February 18, 2018, 06:55:12 AM]