Question.

[Sgt.Rocknroll]

Now Thats how you do it!

Its a big bugger isnt it?

Great work Sarge 

Thanks, that was one of the first videos I ever did. I just drew the shapes, extruded them based on the shadows and the contours of the shapes and that's what I got. I don't remember but I think we estimated the object to be about 30' in length...(don't quote me on that )...But it was fun

PEACE
Rock

[ArMaP]

I quite like what this guy has done.

I do not.

It looks like another person that thinks that "enhancement" means turn the image in what they want to see.

He says that "This object is clearly out of focus and blurred", but that's only because he zoomed in too much, the object is neither out of focus or blurred in the photo. So, he tries to compensate the too much zoom he applied by using some filters, which further destroy information that was on the original, not over zoomed image, and introduce more artefacts.

Useless.

[ArMaP]

Thanks, that was one of the first videos I ever did. I just drew the shapes, extruded them based on the shadows and the contours of the shapes and that's what I got. I don't remember but I think we estimated the object to be about 30' in length...(don't quote me on that )...But it was fun

Did you use the sun height above the horizon or did you use an arbitrary value?

[Sgt.Rocknroll]

ArMaP, by now you should know, I'm not very scientific. . I use only what I see. It's pure sight adjustment. If shadows appear to be "x" length then I extrude the object to a length or depth that would match. Purely my own judgement. As I've said many times, I only draw what I think I see.

Peace
Rock

[zorgon]

What we NEED is a few photos that make ArMaP go

WOW

[Sgt.Rocknroll]

Sorry but I don't think that'll ever happen

[ichiban]

While we're on the subject, what ever happened to MikeSingh?
I found his mars photos fascinating.

[Sgt.Rocknroll]

as a side note, just flipped channels to TCM, and 'Jules Verne's 'From the Earth to the Moon' is on..1958 with Joseph Cotton and George Sanders and a giant cannon!...good stuff...

[robomont]

that does look really good.armap
thanx for the example.

[ArMaP]

ArMaP, by now you should know, I'm not very scientific. . I use only what I see. It's pure sight adjustment. If shadows appear to be "x" length then I extrude the object to a length or depth that would match. Purely my own judgement. As I've said many times, I only draw what I think I see.

Peace
Rock

We can correct that.

The incidence angle was 61.15º, which means that the Sun was 28.85º above the horizon. With that value we can know that a, for example, 4 pixels long shadow means a height of 2.2 pixels, based on the formula:
shadow length = height / tan(Sun altitude)

(I hope I haven't made any mistake in my calculations )

[ArMaP]

Sorry but I don't think that'll ever happen

You only need the right photos.

[Sgt.Rocknroll]

Remember, there aren't any anomalies on the moon? So I don't think you'll ever have the right photo. Lol

Thanks of the 'technical info'. I'll stick with my instincts and sight.


Peace
Rock

[ArMaP]

Remember, there aren't any anomalies on the moon?

Why do you say that?

Even if I could find an explanation for all photos (and that's not the case), that doesn't mean that I have seen photos of all the places, from all the angles, we have only a small percentage of the Moon photographed in high resolution (and not high enough for many things) and an extremely small percentage photographed up close.

Thanks of the 'technical info'. I'll stick with my instincts and sight.

To me, that's wrong.

Why stick to your instincts when you have the real data?

Are you making those videos to give people a better understanding of what is there or just to advertise your point of view, regardless of the truth?

Not good. 

[Sgt.Rocknroll]

Lolololol you take the cake ArMaP! You tell me you've never seen any anomalies and dont think there are any and then you say you have to look at ALL the photos at ALL the angles for anomalies that aren't there?

For your information I made my videos because I enjoyed it. I believe that they're objects on the moon and we haven't been told the truth. I've tried to contribute in my own very small way. I certainly did not create them to please or satisfy you. Nor do I care what you think about my videos or how I create them.

'Not good' ?

In your opinion. I stick with my instincts because that's what I trust. Maybe wrong maybe not. But I really don't give a crap what you think.

Rock

[robomont]

couldnt the anomalies be shot from three angles to make a 3d image of them?

like a shot as the moon rises.directly over head and as it sets.