BRING ON THE TROLLS

[PLAYSWITHMACHINES]

some might say otherwise but as the economy gets tuff,the web at home gets cut but the unlimited phone is kept for as long as possible.plus our future sharkfood is the youth and they live by mobile.

Good call, Robo, even old farts like me use the mobile to read new threads here etc (bit slow, though you can wait 10 minutes for a pic to appear LOL)

Yes, we need some young smart minds that are not yet corrupted by mainstream media, society etc.
I was going to say 'if we can tear them away from their games' but maybe we just need to publish a Pegasus Game?

Platform type thing, discover secrets, create free energy, discover antigravity to get to the next level etc. Saving the world being the goal of the game
Only it's not a game, it's real.

maybe we have to accept that our brethren here could rip us at any minute.nothin we could do really.

I guess that's going to happen when we get too big, at the moment we all share a bond of having been invited here, & we share the bond of looking for answers, sharing knoweledge & ideas.
That alone requires a great deal of mutual trust & respect, which we all seem to have.
Great.

[robomont]

that brought a tear to mine eye.
go team pegasus!

[robomont]

ive been frustrated here lately by physics.
ive got a college level physics book i reference but some of the newest stuff is way out there and i feel like i missed a week of college.
ive always stayed on top but its getting harder.
its amost like another language and i dont know where to start to catch up.
especially all these different particles and functions.
i wish we could recruit some hardcore physicist to get us back on top.
not a part timer but someone who could monitor and correct us on a daily bases.
lead us towards simple but accurate books not gobblygook.

[PLAYSWITHMACHINES]

[PLAYSWITHMACHINES]

We do get hits from some pretty awsome sites, like NASA, Harvard etc.
There are some very big brains lurking & reading this stuff.
One of my main goals with the I.F. is to make sense from the gobbldy-gook as you call it.
Yes, high school physics books are useful (still got mine LOL) but they are not gospel, they contain some very fundamental errors.
Some of these errors are being corrected, like some of the new discoveries using nanotech etc, and particle physics (which was badly in need of a shake-up since it's inception)

And we do sometimes get support from REAL phd's like LaViolette, Aspden & others.
I've had a problem with those books ever since i started reading them 35 years ago, Robo old mate, and the problems are still there.
But we are getting closer to solving them , much closer than i could have hoped for a few years ago.

[robomont]

 ive got two books,both are college physics .one is sixty years old the other is 1991.still pretty current but very little on hv.
i may have to go to a four year university to find like a second year physics book if such a thing exist

[PLAYSWITHMACHINES]

Oddly enough, the older books tend to contain much more info, and are sometimes very open & honest in their presentation.
'we believe it works like this' they will say.
Now it's 'we KNOW it's like this'--but they don't really know an awful lot, it seems. Their math & computer models should have PREDICTED dual particles, but it didn't.
That worries me....rather than just accept their model could be wrong, they are going to pour on the power instead. Daft, if you ask me.

[ArMaP]

i may have to go to a four year university to find like a second year physics book if such a thing exist

Have you looked at this? 

[PLAYSWITHMACHINES]

Oh yes, i read their course on EM theory, it was complete BS

What Lee & co. are doing is impossible according to their own published set of laws?
Don't these departments ever talk to each other?

[robomont]

yea ive ckecked out the new schedule from mit.my phone wont work on it or i would take a few courses.

yes pwm i totally agree the old book is way easier to read and understand.the knowledge is almost the same between them.
i think they are making it hard and confusing on purpose.maybe to limit the knowledge to the general public would be my guess.i think quantum theory is a big mud ball blocking the chalk board.

[robomont]

there has got to be a university somewhere that has it right.
if they dont get it together these four year schools are gonna continue to fail the nation.
research may be going on but the books arent changing to show this.its being hidden or buried from us.
we have to go to fringe sites to find accurate info is so not cool.

[PLAYSWITHMACHINES]

i think they are making it hard and confusing on purpose.

Yes, they are.
That was a Golden comment, freind Robo

Better to read those old books, they give you the basics like Fleming's left hand rule to describe mag fields & currents, Faraday's laws etc. Not convoluted equations for A&B fields & all that crap.
A lot of the situations in those equations are 'assumed', not even theoretically or practically tested

This is the basic info, it works.
You don't need a PHD to understand it or to build machines

[robomont]

i agree totally.

[PLAYSWITHMACHINES]

I feel another thread coming on, called 'picking apart the equations' which will probably give me a headache, but may be necessary for the 'die hard debunkers' & trolls and yet another thread called 'basic electronics, coils & stuff' for all members, since most of you in the group can read diagrams etc it may be cool to give our own electronic workshop...
Anyone up for it?
If i get more than 1 answer, i will consider it.

[Amaterasu]

Well...  I suck at electronics - but only because I never really learned.  Would love to learn and if I can help...count Me in on that, too.