Author Topic: Sex With Non-Humans (Read 1804 times)

Ellirium113 · « **Reply #15 on:** July 25, 2017, 04:17:04 PM »

Quote from: space otter on July 25, 2017, 03:03:58 PM

how do you know that ?

Murphy's law... Necessity makes strange bedfellows.

I need not go through the entire historical archive of sexual encounters with non-humans. Just search it you will find it.

The Seeker · « **Reply #16 on:** July 25, 2017, 04:38:54 PM »

Quote from: space otter on July 25, 2017, 03:42:07 PM

ah seeker I know you have come thur a lot of the literature I have
and the old fairy tales(?) say that mars was just one of the races that came here

the last one I remember reading about was the russian boy who remembers being from mars

the natives of most countries have stories of being from elsewhere originally
all the old mythology..before tv and comics rewrote them

Quite true, otterus

and let us not forget Robert Morningsky and the terra papers; the Hopi are waiting to return to the sky, the aussie abos point up towards home...

Seeker

Shasta56 · « **Reply #17 on:** July 25, 2017, 04:45:49 PM »

Quote from: biggles on July 25, 2017, 04:07:02 PM

Sex with non-humans, the ex-husband.

Been there, done that.

ArMaP · « **Reply #18 on:** July 25, 2017, 04:53:05 PM »

I have one doubt about the title: were some already human and the others were not, or were non of them human yet? Or were all humans? The research doesn't appear to make that distinction.

Irene · « **Reply #19 on:** July 25, 2017, 05:47:30 PM »

Biggles and Shasta, looks like we have a trifecta. That last one of mine put me off my feed permanently.

Irene

biggles · « **Reply #20 on:** July 25, 2017, 09:35:31 PM »

Quote from: Irene on July 25, 2017, 05:47:30 PM

Biggles and Shasta, looks like we have a trifecta. That last one of mine put me off my feed permanently.

Irene

yep hon, I know how you feel. xo

The Seeker · « **Reply #21 on:** July 26, 2017, 01:08:27 AM »

Quote from: ArMaP on July 25, 2017, 04:53:05 PM

I have one doubt about the title: were some already human and the others were not, or were non of them human yet? Or were all humans? The research doesn't appear to make that distinction.

I noticed that, ArMap; the line of distinction appears to be a group of "homonids"- using that as a search term, this group is pre-human, before homo-sapien came into being;

So my take is that none of the test group were human; yet. My issue with this research is the way they worded the discourse; "ghost species" of "proto-humans" means, to me, that something changed and they don't have a clue what, they just want to talk about the fact that they think they found where something changed, but really don't know what, or why.

thorfourwinds · « **Reply #22 on:** July 26, 2017, 01:28:58 PM »

Quote from: Irene on July 25, 2017, 05:47:30 PM

Biggles and Shasta, looks like we have a trifecta. That last one of mine put me off my feed permanently.

Irene

YIKES!
And we thought the only thing to worry about was dykes on bikes!

Irene, Biggles and Shasta - The Three Moosketeers…LOVE YA for the laughs!

And good to know that we boys are safe here...