collapse

Author Topic: The case for the civilization on the Moon  (Read 40309 times)

Offline The Seeker

  • grouchy, old, but inquisitive...
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3757
  • Gold 426
  • The one-armed Bandit
Re: The case for the civilization on the Moon
« Reply #45 on: May 24, 2012, 04:57:11 pm »
Armap, old friend, if you read the accounts and reports from the deliberate crashing of that craft into the lunar surface, the report states that " it rang like a bell", not an anvil. ;D implying that it is not solid...

perhaps we will find out soon...


seeker
Look closely: See clearly: Think deeply; and Choose wisely...
Trolls are crunchy and good with ketchup...
Seekers Domain

Offline Amaterasu

  • The Roundtable
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6713
  • Gold 276
  • Information Will Free Us
    • T.A.P. - You're It
Re: The case for the civilization on the Moon
« Reply #46 on: May 24, 2012, 05:02:53 pm »
Armap, old friend, if you read the accounts and reports from the deliberate crashing of that craft into the lunar surface, the report states that " it rang like a bell", not an anvil. ;D implying that it is not solid...

perhaps we will find out soon...


seeker

For a long while, at that.  Solid things don'r keep reverberating for long periods of time...  Just sayin'.
"If the universe is made of mostly Dark Energy...can We use it to run Our cars?"

"If You want peace, take the profit out of war."

Offline ArMaP

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13171
  • Gold 770
Re: The case for the civilization on the Moon
« Reply #47 on: May 24, 2012, 05:24:07 pm »
ArMaP, have you never struck a steel anvil"?
Yes. :)

And it did reverberated for some time. The biggest difference is that anvils are usually placed in a way that is not that good at letting them reverberate (they are not supposed to be used to make music, although it would make for an interesting band :D ), so the reverberating gets attenuated. If you place a bell on a table, will it ring "like a bell"? No, because there's something preventing it from doing that, for a bell to reverberate like a bell it needs to be as free from contact with anything as possible, that's why they are usually suspended.

I don't know where people got the idea that for something to reverberate "like a bell" it must be hollow. A tuning fork, for example, is not hollow. Cymbals are not hollow.

If you strike a large stone with a hammer you can ear it reverberate for some time.

Offline ArMaP

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13171
  • Gold 770
Re: The case for the civilization on the Moon
« Reply #48 on: May 24, 2012, 05:25:12 pm »
Solid things don'r keep reverberating for long periods of time...
They really do, just try it for yourself. :)

Offline Amaterasu

  • The Roundtable
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6713
  • Gold 276
  • Information Will Free Us
    • T.A.P. - You're It
Re: The case for the civilization on the Moon
« Reply #49 on: May 24, 2012, 07:46:22 pm »
They really do, just try it for yourself. :)

I'll take Your word for it... 
"If the universe is made of mostly Dark Energy...can We use it to run Our cars?"

"If You want peace, take the profit out of war."

sky otter

  • Guest
Re: The case for the civilization on the Moon
« Reply #50 on: May 24, 2012, 08:01:02 pm »
apologizes in advance..

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PV7Rjju5p3o[/youtube]

and of course..the anvil chorus..

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c3x-pwJGsgU[/youtube]

tiptoeing away now
« Last Edit: May 24, 2012, 08:43:49 pm by sky otter »

Offline ArMaP

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13171
  • Gold 770
Re: The case for the civilization on the Moon
« Reply #51 on: May 26, 2012, 04:47:41 pm »
apologizes in advance..

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PV7Rjju5p3o[/youtube]
Thanks for that, it's a perfect example of what I was saying. :)

Offline The Seeker

  • grouchy, old, but inquisitive...
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3757
  • Gold 426
  • The one-armed Bandit
Re: The case for the civilization on the Moon
« Reply #52 on: May 26, 2012, 08:33:50 pm »
Armap I think we are a little off track and missing the mark here; yes, an anvil will resonate; but the moon, if it is a solid chunk of rock and dirt, shouldn't; but it did...


seeker
Look closely: See clearly: Think deeply; and Choose wisely...
Trolls are crunchy and good with ketchup...
Seekers Domain

Offline ArMaP

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13171
  • Gold 770
Re: The case for the civilization on the Moon
« Reply #53 on: May 27, 2012, 09:03:44 am »
Armap I think we are a little off track and missing the mark here; yes, an anvil will resonate;
Why does it resonate? Because there's nothing to slow the vibration induced by the hammer. If it's on a table, the table will vibrate, but some of the vibrations will be absorbed by the contact between the anvil and the table.

Quote
but the moon, if it is a solid chunk of rock and dirt, shouldn't;
Why? A solid rock vibrates when hit. If the Moon was only made of dirt it wouldn't resonate, by a solid rock would.

bobathome

  • Guest
Re: The case for the civilization on the Moon
« Reply #54 on: June 01, 2012, 09:42:02 pm »
And it could have been placed there,
perfectly,
as the watcher.
 A little battered.
but hey that was quite the show she put on the other night.

 small thinking,its a Galaxy out there.
 Team work, too perfection,what are the odds,
in a Galaxy this big,
:)
:)
« Last Edit: June 02, 2012, 11:04:26 am by undo11 »

Offline rdunk

  • The Roundtable
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3129
  • Gold 389
Re: The case for the civilization on the Moon
« Reply #55 on: June 01, 2012, 10:20:27 pm »
Thanks for that, it's a perfect example of what I was saying. :)

Not really a good example at all. An anvil is not useful for an anvil, unless it is hard mounted. Strike when it is hard mounted, and see if you get the same action.

Also doesn't have the solid look of any anvil I have seen! A true anvil is one solid piece of steel. The anvil in the video even sounds hollow, as it is struck. ????
« Last Edit: June 01, 2012, 10:31:35 pm by rdunk »

bobathome

  • Guest
Re: The case for the civilization on the Moon
« Reply #56 on: June 01, 2012, 10:26:07 pm »
not sure if this applies,
when the monks version of accounts was given too nasa, of the whack the moon took,
it was still vibrating,
measurements were taken,
lasers remember,would be able too measure, vibrations,
anyway, was confirmed.
the monks account.
« Last Edit: June 01, 2012, 10:55:52 pm by undo11 »

Offline ArMaP

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13171
  • Gold 770
Re: The case for the civilization on the Moon
« Reply #57 on: June 02, 2012, 10:59:59 am »
Not really a good example at all. An anvil is not useful for an anvil, unless it is hard mounted.
Is the Moon "hard mounted"?

Quote
Also doesn't have the solid look of any anvil I have seen! A true anvil is one solid piece of steel. The anvil in the video even sounds hollow, as it is struck. ????
Get an iron box and an iron block, then struck both. Which one rings better?

PS: Maybe the Moon is related to the ringing rocks, maybe those olivine diabase rocks.  :)

Offline Pimander

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4994
  • Gold 368
Re: The case for the civilization on the Moon
« Reply #58 on: June 02, 2012, 11:31:20 am »
The mass of the Moon indicates that it is unlikely to be completely hollow.  It might be partly hollow but can't be completely hollow or its mass would be smaller and it's orbital position would be closer to Earth.

Offline undo11

  • Creator of game worlds
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4161
  • Gold 226
Re: The case for the civilization on the Moon
« Reply #59 on: June 02, 2012, 11:37:59 am »
The mass of the Moon indicates that it is unlikely to be completely hollow.  It might be partly hollow but can't be completely hollow or its mass would be smaller and it's orbital position would be closer to Earth.

unless it's being kept in that orbit, artifically.  you have to admit, it has alot of unusual features relating to orbit, rotation and etc.
JOIN THE GAME!
Are you a programmer or 3d modeler?  We need you here: http://www.thelivingmoon.com/forum1/index.php?topic=530.0

 


Wal-Mart.com USA, LLC
affiliate_link
Free Click Tracking
Wal-Mart.com USA, LLC
Official John Lear Tin Foil Hat $19.99

* Recent Posts

Re: kits to feed your family for a year by Shasta56
[March 17, 2024, 12:40:48 pm]


Re: kits to feed your family for a year by space otter
[March 16, 2024, 08:45:27 pm]


Re: kits to feed your family for a year by Shasta56
[March 16, 2024, 07:24:38 pm]


Re: kits to feed your family for a year by space otter
[March 16, 2024, 10:41:21 am]


Re: Full Interview - Lance Corporal Jonathan Weygandt (1997) by RUSSO
[March 12, 2024, 07:22:56 pm]


Re: Full Interview - Lance Corporal Jonathan Weygandt (1997) by RUSSO
[March 09, 2024, 03:25:56 am]


Re: Full Interview - Lance Corporal Jonathan Weygandt (1997) by RUSSO
[March 09, 2024, 02:33:38 am]


Re: Music You Love by RUSSO
[March 09, 2024, 01:10:22 am]


Re: The Man Who Built UFOs For The CIA (Not Bob Lazar!) by RUSSO
[March 09, 2024, 12:14:14 am]


Re: Full Interview - Lance Corporal Jonathan Weygandt (1997) by RUSSO
[March 09, 2024, 12:08:46 am]


Re: A peculiar stone in DeForest by Canine
[March 03, 2024, 11:54:22 am]


Re: The Man Who Built UFOs For The CIA (Not Bob Lazar!) by kevin
[March 03, 2024, 11:30:06 am]


Re: The Man Who Built UFOs For The CIA (Not Bob Lazar!) by kevin
[March 03, 2024, 11:21:15 am]


Re: The Man Who Built UFOs For The CIA (Not Bob Lazar!) by kevin
[March 03, 2024, 11:16:05 am]


Re: Music You Love by RUSSO
[March 02, 2024, 07:58:09 pm]


Re: Full Interview - Lance Corporal Jonathan Weygandt (1997) by RUSSO
[March 02, 2024, 07:50:59 pm]


Re: The Man Who Built UFOs For The CIA (Not Bob Lazar!) by RUSSO
[March 02, 2024, 07:43:03 pm]


Re: The Man Who Built UFOs For The CIA (Not Bob Lazar!) by RUSSO
[March 02, 2024, 07:41:30 pm]


Re: The Man Who Built UFOs For The CIA (Not Bob Lazar!) by kevin
[March 01, 2024, 11:54:23 am]


Re: The Man Who Built UFOs For The CIA (Not Bob Lazar!) by kevin
[March 01, 2024, 11:34:15 am]