collapse

Author Topic: Electrogravitics – A Simplified Description  (Read 52958 times)

Offline SarK0Y

  • Pegasus Alternate Energy Team
  • Full Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 395
  • Gold 37
Re: Electrogravitics – A Simplified Description
« Reply #135 on: July 02, 2012, 11:54:53 am »
OHHH.  Right right right.  Long day, rather tired.

So You're saying that the greater speed makes the greater mass, and this fact too contradicts such conjecture of LaViolette's work or...?
why particle's charge doesn't increase with greater velocity?
I do What Me'n'Universum  want :-)

Offline Amaterasu

  • The Roundtable
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6713
  • Gold 276
  • Information Will Free Us
    • T.A.P. - You're It
Re: Electrogravitics – A Simplified Description
« Reply #136 on: July 02, 2012, 01:03:20 pm »
I had not read anything one way or the other.  LaViolette does not address the charge relative to velocity in Secrets of Antigravity Propulsion (I am squiggly-challenged, so have not read the more challenging book), but I am unsure how it might be expected to...
"If the universe is made of mostly Dark Energy...can We use it to run Our cars?"

"If You want peace, take the profit out of war."

Offline SarK0Y

  • Pegasus Alternate Energy Team
  • Full Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 395
  • Gold 37
Re: Electrogravitics – A Simplified Description
« Reply #137 on: July 02, 2012, 01:38:59 pm »
unless theory has no clear explanation about that collision, it'd be too gloomy to bet on such a horsey.
I do What Me'n'Universum  want :-)

Offline Amaterasu

  • The Roundtable
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6713
  • Gold 276
  • Information Will Free Us
    • T.A.P. - You're It
Re: Electrogravitics – A Simplified Description
« Reply #138 on: July 02, 2012, 01:51:43 pm »
Don't know if it does or not, Sar.  Maybe You have the squiggly skills to get though Subquantum Kinetics (by LaViolette, of course).

Report back on whether it addresses that or not.  Secrets only was a quick overview in with discussions of things using the Biefeld-Brown Effect - which SQK predicts (and relativity does not) - and other interesting and related stuff.

I would be most interested to hear.
« Last Edit: July 02, 2012, 01:54:06 pm by Amaterasu »
"If the universe is made of mostly Dark Energy...can We use it to run Our cars?"

"If You want peace, take the profit out of war."

Offline SarK0Y

  • Pegasus Alternate Energy Team
  • Full Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 395
  • Gold 37
Re: Electrogravitics – A Simplified Description
« Reply #139 on: July 02, 2012, 02:14:02 pm »
Synchrotron has to intensify magnetic field to hold beam on within proper radius because particle's mass goes wild as much as gets closer to c - velocity. so this example doesn't & cannot show the direct relation of mass with charge.
I do What Me'n'Universum  want :-)

Offline Linda Brown

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2282
  • Gold 52
    • The Cosmic Token
Re: Electrogravitics – A Simplified Description
« Reply #140 on: July 02, 2012, 02:16:12 pm »
All due respect Sarkoy

I don't understand a word that you just said.

Was that my fault or are you intentionally doing that?

Linda
« Last Edit: July 03, 2012, 07:59:37 am by Linda Brown »

Offline SarK0Y

  • Pegasus Alternate Energy Team
  • Full Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 395
  • Gold 37
Re: Electrogravitics – A Simplified Description
« Reply #141 on: July 02, 2012, 02:27:47 pm »
All due respect Sarkov

I don't understand a word that you just said.

Was that my fault or are you intentionally doing that?

Linda

Linda, example, please. + it'd be helpful, if you re-write parts (that were unclear  4 you) in the way ye understood'em. thanks in Advance  :)   
I do What Me'n'Universum  want :-)

dcooper

  • Guest
Re: Electrogravitics – A Simplified Description
« Reply #142 on: July 02, 2012, 02:47:59 pm »
SorKOY if you want examples go to the www.thomastownsendbrown.com the go to Library then the best place go to Stress in dielectric.  and also www.thomastownsendbrown.com/forum  the click Thomas T. Brown tech. and click my post Elecrogravitic diff from Electromagnetic and you will get examples, Linda you Know you dad found and could not dismiss that there was a strong mass - charge & electricity- and gravity coupling

and by the way the coupling of charge has nothing to do with V because charge does not increase with v has nothing to do with the EG coupling between mass-charge that's OBVISE
« Last Edit: July 02, 2012, 02:54:40 pm by dcooper »

Offline Linda Brown

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2282
  • Gold 52
    • The Cosmic Token
Re: Electrogravitics – A Simplified Description
« Reply #143 on: July 02, 2012, 03:00:31 pm »
When I said that I didn't understand a word that you said I meant exactly that. Not a combination.... not a part there of. Nothing. When I am dense. I am surprisingly densel

Linda

Offline SarK0Y

  • Pegasus Alternate Energy Team
  • Full Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 395
  • Gold 37
Re: Electrogravitics – A Simplified Description
« Reply #144 on: July 02, 2012, 04:22:35 pm »
well, Amici, i wanna see this effect in the kinda vacuum chamber, shielded against Earth magnetic field  ::)

P.S.

Linda, at least, post's number, please. i hella am  not a remote viewer cuz Ancient Bro cruelly did turn my f*King telepathy off  ;)
I do What Me'n'Universum  want :-)

Offline Linda Brown

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2282
  • Gold 52
    • The Cosmic Token
Re: Electrogravitics – A Simplified Description
« Reply #145 on: July 02, 2012, 04:37:23 pm »
Sarkov.... we are still having a failure to communicate. You keep on talking to others and when I finally get it I will chime in on the conversation. Don't worry/   Linda

Offline SarK0Y

  • Pegasus Alternate Energy Team
  • Full Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 395
  • Gold 37
Re: Electrogravitics – A Simplified Description
« Reply #146 on: July 02, 2012, 04:54:51 pm »
Sarkov.... we are still having a failure to communicate. You keep on talking to others and when I finally get it I will chime in on the conversation. Don't worry/   Linda

good idea, Linda  :) + i'm already not worried.  8)
I do What Me'n'Universum  want :-)

Offline arc

  • Regular Members
  • *
  • Posts: 87
  • Gold 31
Re: Electrogravitics – A Simplified Description
« Reply #147 on: July 02, 2012, 05:07:04 pm »
what about colliders?  ::) the greater speed makes the greater mass. this fact too contradicts such conjecture  :)

Greater "speed"/velocity results in higher "Impact Energy". But  remember the "particles" are being accelerated by using a strong magnetic field supplied by the superconducting magnetic torus. Each particle is effectively being pumped up to higher energy levels.. hence apparent mass increase.  Their energy is related to the intrinsic relativistic effects.

So is the TTB effect...


if it is raining and you want to walk outside, do you fire up a 100Billion watt giant fan heater to blow the clouds away... and expend 5 years worth of energy in 10 minutes.. or do you simply take an umbrella, and use your simple but subtle diversion shield  ...

arc
« Last Edit: July 02, 2012, 05:14:53 pm by arc »

Offline Linda Brown

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2282
  • Gold 52
    • The Cosmic Token
Re: Electrogravitics – A Simplified Description
« Reply #148 on: July 02, 2012, 06:04:18 pm »
" your simple but subtle diversion shield  ...

The.... KISS Principle............a diversion shield.

Linda

deuem

  • Guest
Re: Electrogravitics – A Simplified Description
« Reply #149 on: July 03, 2012, 05:20:27 am »
Sarkoy, if I may ask?  Is English your mother language or are you translating?
Thanks

 


Wal-Mart.com USA, LLC
affiliate_link
Free Click Tracking
Wal-Mart.com USA, LLC

* Recent Posts

Re: kits to feed your family for a year by Shasta56
[March 17, 2024, 12:40:48 pm]


Re: kits to feed your family for a year by space otter
[March 16, 2024, 08:45:27 pm]


Re: kits to feed your family for a year by Shasta56
[March 16, 2024, 07:24:38 pm]


Re: kits to feed your family for a year by space otter
[March 16, 2024, 10:41:21 am]


Re: Full Interview - Lance Corporal Jonathan Weygandt (1997) by RUSSO
[March 12, 2024, 07:22:56 pm]


Re: Full Interview - Lance Corporal Jonathan Weygandt (1997) by RUSSO
[March 09, 2024, 03:25:56 am]


Re: Full Interview - Lance Corporal Jonathan Weygandt (1997) by RUSSO
[March 09, 2024, 02:33:38 am]


Re: Music You Love by RUSSO
[March 09, 2024, 01:10:22 am]


Re: The Man Who Built UFOs For The CIA (Not Bob Lazar!) by RUSSO
[March 09, 2024, 12:14:14 am]


Re: Full Interview - Lance Corporal Jonathan Weygandt (1997) by RUSSO
[March 09, 2024, 12:08:46 am]


Re: A peculiar stone in DeForest by Canine
[March 03, 2024, 11:54:22 am]


Re: The Man Who Built UFOs For The CIA (Not Bob Lazar!) by kevin
[March 03, 2024, 11:30:06 am]


Re: The Man Who Built UFOs For The CIA (Not Bob Lazar!) by kevin
[March 03, 2024, 11:21:15 am]


Re: The Man Who Built UFOs For The CIA (Not Bob Lazar!) by kevin
[March 03, 2024, 11:16:05 am]


Re: Music You Love by RUSSO
[March 02, 2024, 07:58:09 pm]


Re: Full Interview - Lance Corporal Jonathan Weygandt (1997) by RUSSO
[March 02, 2024, 07:50:59 pm]


Re: The Man Who Built UFOs For The CIA (Not Bob Lazar!) by RUSSO
[March 02, 2024, 07:43:03 pm]


Re: The Man Who Built UFOs For The CIA (Not Bob Lazar!) by RUSSO
[March 02, 2024, 07:41:30 pm]


Re: The Man Who Built UFOs For The CIA (Not Bob Lazar!) by kevin
[March 01, 2024, 11:54:23 am]


Re: The Man Who Built UFOs For The CIA (Not Bob Lazar!) by kevin
[March 01, 2024, 11:34:15 am]