collapse

Author Topic: The U.S. Is Unable To Account For 36k Pounds Of Weapons Grade Uranium And Pluton  (Read 34934 times)

Offline space otter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5659
  • Gold 691


pretty unreal, huh !!!!..there used to be a really nice restaurant right beside the plant where we ate often...wild stuff when you think about it


a first cousin of hubby's worked there after serving in the marines and has he got some stories


http://triblive.com/local/valleynewsdispatch/12353545-74/amount-of-nuclear-waste-in-parks-township-could-remain-unknown-until-2031

Amount of nuclear waste in Parks Township could remain unknown until 2031
Sunday, June 11, 2017, 1:48 a.m.   MARY ANN THOMAS


today  homeland security guards the property

Secrecy, lack of documentation and inattention to warnings may have led the Army Corps of Engineers to grossly underestimate the amount of highly radioactive uranium in the nuclear waste dump in Parks Township.
..
What's in that dump could be key to solving the more than 50-year-old mystery of what happened to about 200 pounds of highly enriched uranium NUMEC couldn't account for in a 1965 inventory of nuclear material at its plants.
..
The Corps, though, refuses to say how much material was recovered nor will it comment on the exact type of material found because the Department of Defense has classified portions of the cleanup as secret for “national security” reasons.

The Corps says it will release an inventory of what the new cleanup finds when it is complete — in 2031.

.....

Both men said the Corps cleanup plan grossly underestimated all of the nuclear waste they may encounter. Shapiro confirmed as much during exclusive interviews with the Tribune-Review before his death.

Even the Nuclear Regulatory Commission believed there was more uranium in the dump than the Corps was estimating.



............................................................



http://triblive.com/local/valleynewsdispatch/12385261-74/is-missing-radioactive-material-still-buried-in-parks



Is missing radioactive material still buried in Parks?
Sunday, June 11, 2017, 1:51 a.m.    MARY ANN THOMAS 




a dig in the mid-1960s, conducted after NUMEC came up 200 pounds short of highly enriched uranium during an inventory, was ineffective.
....
“There were inexperienced people who were on the job for two days waving a Geiger counter over material exhumed from the burial ground,” Zerby said.

“Did they know what they were doing? Absolutely not. Was it conceivable to miss quantities? You bet.”

......
That 2014 probe found, among other things, that:

• The contractor hired by the Army Corps of Engineers mishandled radioactive waste dug up from the site, endangering the safety of workers.

• Undocumented waste from so-called “black” government projects could be buried at the site.

• A previous dig to look for highly enriched uranium at the site was inadequate.

The Corps' previous contractor mishandled some nuclear waste and unearthed greater amounts of “complex nuclear materials” than expected, according to then-Corps Col. Butch Graham. That material was so hard to identify that it had to be specially handled and was shipped to an undisclosed nuclear waste facility.

The report concluded that the cleanup was “beyond the scope of (the Army Corps') remediation process.”

Documents obtained by the Tribune-Review through a federal Freedom of Information Act request show that

......

Even NUMEC did not record those projects in its official company documentation, instead recording them elsewhere because of their secrecy.

....

Ameno, 65, of Hyde Park also testified. Her collection of about 3 million pages of documents about NUMEC's operations, she said, indicates the waste dump contains more dangerous materials than the site was licensed to take.



..................................................


http://triblive.com/local/valleynewsdispatch/12353791-74/nuclear-material-doled-out-like-it-was-candy-50-years-ago

Nuclear material doled out 'like it was candy' 50 years ago
Sunday, June 11, 2017, 1:51 a.m.   MARY ANN THOMAS

Alvarez doesn't subscribe to the diversion theory. When he worked at the DOE and received CIA assessments, he said, “You can't get enamored with the information. You've got to realize intelligence isn't necessarily the truth. It's an art form.”
....

“Imagine sending out many tons of (highly enriched uranium) to countries around the world for 10 years,” Alvarez said. “We would never do that today.”

But the United States did, sending tons of the stuff around the world during the 1960s and 1970s under a program started by President Dwight Eisenhower called “Atoms for Peace.”

.....

“They were doling out tons of fissile materials like it was candy,” he said.

Offline biggles

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1206
  • Gold 47
It's a nightmare for sure Otter, you never know what your walking on or near and where.  :-\  xxoo
I know that I know nothing - thanks Capricorn.

Offline space otter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5659
  • Gold 691


hey Biggs

this area was a hot bed for ufo sightings..(kecksburg is a mere stone's throw)
not so much anymore..we've got other stuff  but  you do have to wonder if the sightings were because they could see the glow?..bwhahahahahahah
and now we kinda wonder if it was the cause for so many other things going on with the 'critters'....
check out Stan Gordon's site for  some things...but a lot aren't talked about.
me, personally... i'm waiting to see one of those thunderbirds..

maybe some other  hot spots for ufo's should check what else is going on around those areas...just a thought

Offline biggles

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1206
  • Gold 47

hey Biggs

this area was a hot bed for ufo sightings..(kecksburg is a mere stone's throw)
not so much anymore..we've got other stuff  but  you do have to wonder if the sightings were because they could see the glow?..bwhahahahahahah
and now we kinda wonder if it was the cause for so many other things going on with the 'critters'....
check out Stan Gordon's site for  some things...but a lot aren't talked about.
me, personally... i'm waiting to see one of those thunderbirds..

maybe some other  hot spots for ufo's should check what else is going on around those areas...just a thought

That is a good thought, the ETs would probably know exactly how much and where our uranium was thrown. 

I want to see a thunderbird as well BTW. xo
I know that I know nothing - thanks Capricorn.

Offline space otter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5659
  • Gold 691
final update?..

  well looks like the end for this..except the place is still guarded by men with guns from homeland security


http://triblive.com/local/valleynewsdispatch/13358244-74/us-supreme-court-ends-lawsuit-against-apollo-nuclear-fuels-plant-operators

U.S. Supreme Court ends lawsuit against Apollo nuclear fuels plant operators
MARY ANN THOMAS  | Tuesday, Feb. 27, 2018, 9:33 p.m.
Updated 1 hour ago

More than two decades of legal wrangling over whether a former Apollo nuclear fuels plant caused cancers in Armstrong County has been decided by the U.S. Supreme Court.

The country's highest court denied hearing an appeal on Feb. 20 to reinstate lawsuits filed by about 70 Apollo-area residents alleging that radioactive emissions from the plant caused cancer.

The Supreme Court's rejection ends the eight-year federal court case that sputtered and never made it to trial.

That's unlike the first series of lawsuits filed by several hundred plaintiffs that lingered for 14 years in federal court, ending with a settlement of more than $80 million.

“I just wanted to make these big companies aware they just can't ruin people's lives,” said Mary Ann Peace, 68, of North Apollo, a plaintiff who has a rare blood cancer.

Attorneys for the defendants Babcock & Wilcox Power Generation Group and the Atlantic Richfield Co. didn't immediately return phone calls for comment.

They operated a uranium fuel-processing plant founded by the Nuclear Materials and Equipment Corp., or NUMEC, in Apollo and a plutonium plant in Parks Township. The plants operated from about 1957 to the mid-1980s.

The companies have long maintained that their operations didn't cause the alleged cancers in Apollo and other surrounding small towns.

The individual lawsuits for the 70-plus area residents were filed by attorneys from Motley Rice's law firm in Providence, R.I., and a Pittsburgh law firm, Goldberg, Persky and White.

“There are little people here,” Peace said of the low-income, rural communities. “We count, too. We have lives and families, and we hurt.”

Diagnosed in 2010, Peace, like the other plaintiffs, signed onto the lawsuit after the door closed to be included in the first series of lawsuits filed in the 1990s by Fred Baron, a deep-pocketed, Texan attorney who was a pioneer in asbestos litigation.

Peace, who was active much of her life, now reports being fatigued and anemic as she lives with her incurable cancer.

“It robbed me of the freedom to do what I wanted to do,” she said.

One of the lead attorneys on the case, Jonathan Orent, of Motley Rice, agrees.

“We are incredibly disappointed and, quite frankly, devastated by this decision to allow an injustice like this to happen,” he said.

Patty Ameno, 66, of Hyde Park said, calmly, “I'm mad as hell, and I am far from being done with this.”

Ameno, an activist working on local nuclear issues for about 30 years, blames Motley Rice, the firm she recruited, for a “calamity of errors and missteps.”

“The residents' defeat happened at the hands of ineffective counsel, thus ending these people's chance to even get before a jury.”

While this is not the first time Ameno has criticized the law firm, Orent had only compliments for Ameno.

“I commend her long-standing commitment to the cause of justice in Apollo,” he said.

He added: “It's been a great honor in my life to represent the people here.”

WHAT HAPPENED?

While Motley Rice secured experts who conducted studies and analysis of the cancer rates as well as the plant emissions, the court simply was not satisfied with their science, according to Steven Baicker-McKee, an associate professor at Duquesne University School of Law.

The case was thrown out by a lower court, but the plaintiffs appealed and eventually lost the appeal. They then tried to get the Third Circuit Court of Appeals to reconsider, then finally a request to the Supreme Court to weigh in on that decision.

The Supreme Court is not an “error-correcting” court, according to Baicker-McKee. It's not bound to examine decisions from lower court rulings, hearing only slightly more than 2 percent of the requests it receives.

Generally, it's difficult to prove causation in lawsuits alleging death and personal injury from environmental contamination, he said.

“The science has not caught up with the courts,” Baicker-McKee said.

The lower court rulings on the Apollo case “doesn't mean they didn't have legitimate harm. It just means the court system demands a certain amount of proof, and in this case, they didn't have it. It doesn't diminish their real injuries; it means they don't have a cut path for compensation of that.”

Orent said his firm built a case showing that the Apollo nuclear plant routinely had high emissions and that there were higher rates of cancers in the Apollo area. They sampled the dirt, where Orent claimed they could identify the plant's “fingerprints” in area soils.

“Our clients were exposed to airborne contamination, but over time,” Orent said. The court was not satisfied because “we could show there was an increased risk (of cancer), but we couldn't put a number to that risk.”

Orent believes that standard of evidence is impossible and not true to the spirit of state and federal law, citing one of the judges on the Third Circuit panel who believed the same.

Natalie Shutt, 58, of West Leech­burg, mother of one of the plaintiffs who has watched her daughter suffer with adrenal cancer, wants to know why, unlike the first series of lawsuits, she won't get her day in court.

The Baron case, which settled in 2008 and 2009, was considered a milestone because few cases involving alleged injury from radioactive environmental exposure even make it to court, let alone result in a multimillion dollar settlement.

“Why isn't a second trial allowed, and why aren't we being given the same chance?” Shutt said.

Orent said he submitted similar evidence but thinks he was given a “different judicial interpretation” on what the law requires to have as evidence to proceed to a trial.

“Sometimes you get bad rulings,” said Orent, who hopes Apollo residents will try to fight to change the laws.

..................................

MARY ANN THOMAS  | Saturday, Feb. 17, 2018, 12:57 p.m.

http://triblive.com/local/valleynewsdispatch/13298668-74/parks-township-nuclear-dump-cleanup-delayed-again

Parks Township nuclear dump cleanup delayed again

Offline space otter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5659
  • Gold 691

we need an head scratching icon thingie....geeeeeeesh




https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/idaho-state-university-loses-weapons-grade-plutonium-capable-of-making-a-dirty-bomb/ar-AAwVlXs?li=BBnbcA1

Idaho State University loses weapons-grade plutonium capable of making a dirty bomb
FoxNews.com  5 hrs ago

Idaho State University was fined last week for losing a small amount of radioactive, weapons-grade plutonium that is too small to make a nuclear bomb, but could be used in a dirty bomb, according to a regulatory commission.

Dr. Cornelis Van der Schyf, vice president for research at the university, blamed partially completed paperwork from 15 years ago as the school tried to dispose of the plutonium.

"Unfortunately, because there was a lack of sufficient historical records to demonstrate the disposal pathway employed in 2003, the source in question had to be listed as missing," he said in a statement to The Associated Press. "The radioactive source in question poses no direct health issue or risk to public safety."

The school, which reported the material missing on Oct. 13, was hit with an $8,500 fine and has 30 days to dispute the measure.

Victor Dricks, a U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission spokesman, said the agency “has very rigorous controls for the use and storage of radioactive materials as evidenced by this enforcement action," he said of the proposed fine for failing to keep track of the material.

The agency said a school employee doing a routine inventory discovered the university could only account for 13 of its 14 plutonium sources, each weighing about the same small amount.

Idaho State University has a nuclear engineering program and works with the U.S. Department of Energy's Idaho National Laboratory, considered the nation's primary nuclear research lab and located about 65 miles northwest of the school.

The plutonium was being used to develop ways to ensure nuclear waste containers weren't leaking and to find ways to detect radioactive material being illegally brought into the U.S. following the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, the school said in an email to the AP.

The school searched documents and found records from 2003 and 2004 saying the material was on campus and awaiting disposal. However, there were no documents saying the plutonium had been properly disposed.

The last document mentioning the plutonium is dated Nov. 23, 2003. It said the Idaho National Laboratory didn't want the plutonium and the school's technical safety office had it "pending disposal of the next waste shipment."

The school also reviewed documents on waste barrels there and others transferred off campus since 2003, and opened and examined some of them. Finally, officials searched the campus but didn't find the plutonium.

The nuclear commission said senior university officials planned to return the school's remaining plutonium to the Energy Department. It's not clear if that has happened.

Energy Department officials didn't return calls seeking comment Friday.

Dricks, the commission spokesman, said returning the plutonium was part of the school's plan to reduce its inventory of radioactive material.

He said overall it has "a good record with the NRC."

The Associated Press contributed to this report

Offline space otter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5659
  • Gold 691



yet another update

well since i starting posting this i guess i will continue..it's just a tiny piece of what is going on with all the old nuke stuff..
if you are ever in this part of the world you will see orange creeks.. that's run off from the old coal mines ..they were everywhere and a lot are not mapped...
the state sales mine subsidence insurance  because a some of them collapse
cool, huh?


https://triblive.com/local/valleynewsdispatch/14294779-74/army-corps-of-engineers-says-500-million-parks-twp-nuclear-waste-removal
Mary Ann Thomas  Wednesday, Nov. 14, 2018, 11:30 p.m.


Quote
Army Corps of Engineers: $500 million Parks Township nuclear waste removal project is a 'go'

Updated 10 hours ago


The Army Corps of Engineers released test results and announced to residents Wednesday it is ready to resume the $500 million cleanup of the nuclear waste dump in Parks Township.

The 44-acre dump, officially known as the Shallow Land Disposal Area, is off Route 66 near Kiskimere Street. It was owned in the 1960s by the Nuclear Materials and Equipment Corp. (NUMEC) which had plants in Apollo and Parks Township that produced nuclear fuels for Navy submarines, power plants and other government programs.

About 80 people attended the public meeting Wednesday at the Parks Township volunteer fire hall.

It featured a review of the project, which stalled seven years ago amid environmental test results.

The recent slowdown was an almost 18-month delay over a contract bid protest from the four bidders that didn’t win the $350 million contract to excavate the nuclear waste dump.

But the Army Corps reviewed the bids and recently lifted a stop-order on the federal contract that had been awarded to Jacobs Field Services to clean up the nuclear waste dump.

“We own this project,” said Col. Andrew “Coby” Short, commander of the Corps’ Pittsburgh District. “We have a contract. We have the money.

”We’re ready to go.”

Jacobs will develop a work plan through 2019, build cleanup facilities at the dump in 2020, then start excavating in 2021, said Brian Molloy, Corps project manager.

Digging, separating and shipping the contaminants from 10 trenches could take 10 years.

Environmental activist Patty Ameno of Hyde Park asked if the Corps would consider installing a temporary containment shelter around the dig site to “minimize fugitive dust and keep up security.”

Molloy said that’s an issue the contractor would address in the work plans.

Resident Bob Szitas, formerly of Parks Township but now an Allegheny Township resident, asked Corps officials how they could guarantee continuity of staff expertise given the project’s 10-year duration.

“I’m new,” Molloy said. “It’s a challenge and it’s a complex project, but we have a process.”

Szitas said he was satisfied with the Corps’ formal procedures to pass down information, but was concerned if that will be the case with contractors.

The Corps continues to monitor the groundwater annually at the site. Officials said it found once again that the levels of radioactive contaminants in the groundwater are below the federal and state drinking water quality standards. Resident who live near the dump have access to public water.

The Corps’ recent sampling found that the radiological contamination is not migrating offsite.

However, the recent groundwater tests show that beryllium, a metal used by the nuclear plants and buried on site found its way into the underground coal mines, which lie beneath the site.

The catacomb of mines has been a longtime concern as a pathway for the dump site’s contamination.

Mary Ann Thomas is a Tribune-Review staff writer
.......................................
some odd facts from a goggle seacrh for  beryllium


Beryllium is a chemical element with symbol Be and atomic number 4. It is a relatively rare element in the universe, usually occurring as a product of the spallation of larger atomic nuclei that have collided with cosmic rays. Within the cores of stars beryllium is depleted as it is fused and creates larger elements.
Beryllium - Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beryllium

Health effects of beryllium. Beryllium is not an element that is crucial for humans; in fact it is one of the most toxic chemicals we know. It is a metal that can be very harmful when humans breathe it in, because it can damage the lungs and cause pneumonia.

Interesting Beryllium Facts: It is a hard metal, but is brittle at room temperature. Beryllium salts have a sweet taste, and the element was once called glucine with a symbol of Gl due to its flavor. Beryllium has a long history, having been known to the ancient Egyptians in beryl and in emeralds.

The Chemical Society's internet periodic table says beryllium is used "to increase the ability to conduct electricity" in copper and nickel, but this is erroneous. Beryllium improves the mechanical properties of the metals, but does not increase the resistivity as much as other alloying elements.Mar 4, 2004

Beryllium powder is explosive and flammable. 1.3 Composition Beryllium metal, the oxide (beryllia), and various alloys, particularly the beryllium-copper alloy, are all of commercial importance. ... World production of beryllium is estimated to be of the order of 400 tonnes per year.

The surface of beryllium metal is covered with a thin layer of oxide that helps protect the metal from attack by acids, but powdered beryllium metal dissolves readily in dilute acids such as sulphuric acid, H2SO4, hydrochloric acid, HCl, or nitric acid, HNO3, to form solutions containing the aquated Be(II) ion together ...
« Last Edit: November 15, 2018, 08:48:29 am by space otter »

Offline space otter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5659
  • Gold 691

well it's been afew years but this joke just keeps on ..since the last posting there have been several articles on yet another and another clean up..but nothing happens..
so  the latest is here..   where has all the money gone....administration, maybe?   

https://triblive.com/local/valley-news-dispatch/350-million-contract-to-cleanup-parks-township-nuclear-waste-site-isnt-enough-feds-say/

$350 million contract to cleanup Parks Township nuclear waste site isn't enough, feds say
Kellen Stepler
KELLEN STEPLER   | Friday, Dec. 1, 2023 4:54 p.m.


overview of the nuclear waste dump in parks twp

The $350 million earmarked for cleanup of the Parks Township nuclear waste dump isn’t enough to finish the job, so the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is looking for new contractors interested in continuing the cleanup when that money runs out.

The Corps on Friday announced it will issue a “sources sought notice” for market research and planning for the cleanup at the site, known formally as the Shallow Land Disposal Area. The anticipated value of the additional contract is $250 million to $500 million, according to the Corps.

Nuclear Materials and Equipment Corp. (NUMEC) buried radioactive waste on the site in the 1960s. The 44-acre site is along Route 66 near Kiskimere Road. It contains 10 trenches of contaminated waste and soil.
Remediation is anticipated to begin in spring 2025 with completion in 2032.

“As we’ve learned more about what’s needed to remediate the SLDA site through our design process, we have determined the $350 million limit on the current contract is insufficient to complete the work. Therefore, to avoid a potential operational stop, we are proactively working to acquire a new contract to enable us to complete the remediation,” said Steven Vriesen, project manager with the Corps’ Buffalo District, which is overseeing the project.

Remediation plans include removing the contaminated soil and waste and disposing of it elsewhere.

The Buffalo District is working with the Pittsburgh Corps because, Vriesen said, it has experience managing FUSRAP (Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program) projects like the one in Parks Township.

He cited the current Luckey Site cleanup south of Toledo, Ohio, as an example. There, the Corps is cleaning up a former radioactive mineral processing plant that dates to the 1940s.

FUSRAP was initiated to identify, investigate and clean up or control sites nationwide that were contaminated because of the nation’s atomic weapons and energy programs, according to the Corps.

Jacobs Technology of Tullahoma, Tenn., holds the current contract for the Parks Township nuclear waste dump site. It’s anticipated that Jacobs will begin physical remediation in spring 2025, which includes removal and off-site disposal of contaminated soil and waste.

The Corps held a public information meeting about the project Sept. 20. There, officials explained the work they’ve done and their cleanup plans.

Since then, crews have completed clearing the overgrown fence line, installed administration trailers and started grading for a new on-site laboratory, Vriesen said.

Jacobs Technology will continue preparing the site over the next year to 18 months.

Vriesen said more information on the site’s progress can be found online at https://www.lrp.usace.army.mil/Missions/Planning- Programs-Project-Management/Key-Projects/Shallow-Land-Disposal-Area/; or by visiting the Apollo Memorial Library, 219 N. Pennsylvania Ave.

Kellen Stepler is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Kellen by email at kstepler@triblive.com or via Twitter .

Offline RUSSO

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2504
  • Gold 423
  • Why are you wearing that stupid man suit?
    • PEGASUS RESEARCH CONSORTIUM
When you have pentagon trillion dollars missing year after year, might as well be hanged for a sheep as a lamb.

"Battle not with monsters, lest ye become a monster, and if you gaze into the abyss, the abyss gazes also into you."

Offline RUSSO

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2504
  • Gold 423
  • Why are you wearing that stupid man suit?
    • PEGASUS RESEARCH CONSORTIUM
Here in Brazil we have a expession for it:

O que é um peidinho para quem está cagado?  :D
"Battle not with monsters, lest ye become a monster, and if you gaze into the abyss, the abyss gazes also into you."

Offline RUSSO

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2504
  • Gold 423
  • Why are you wearing that stupid man suit?
    • PEGASUS RESEARCH CONSORTIUM
Here in Brazil we have a expession for it:

O que é um peidinho para quem está cagado?  :D

Sorry not expession. Saying is the word.
"Battle not with monsters, lest ye become a monster, and if you gaze into the abyss, the abyss gazes also into you."

 


Wal-Mart.com USA, LLC
affiliate_link
Free Click Tracking
Wal-Mart.com USA, LLC

* Recent Posts

Re: kits to feed your family for a year by Shasta56
[March 17, 2024, 12:40:48 pm]


Re: kits to feed your family for a year by space otter
[March 16, 2024, 08:45:27 pm]


Re: kits to feed your family for a year by Shasta56
[March 16, 2024, 07:24:38 pm]


Re: kits to feed your family for a year by space otter
[March 16, 2024, 10:41:21 am]


Re: Full Interview - Lance Corporal Jonathan Weygandt (1997) by RUSSO
[March 12, 2024, 07:22:56 pm]


Re: Full Interview - Lance Corporal Jonathan Weygandt (1997) by RUSSO
[March 09, 2024, 03:25:56 am]


Re: Full Interview - Lance Corporal Jonathan Weygandt (1997) by RUSSO
[March 09, 2024, 02:33:38 am]


Re: Music You Love by RUSSO
[March 09, 2024, 01:10:22 am]


Re: The Man Who Built UFOs For The CIA (Not Bob Lazar!) by RUSSO
[March 09, 2024, 12:14:14 am]


Re: Full Interview - Lance Corporal Jonathan Weygandt (1997) by RUSSO
[March 09, 2024, 12:08:46 am]


Re: A peculiar stone in DeForest by Canine
[March 03, 2024, 11:54:22 am]


Re: The Man Who Built UFOs For The CIA (Not Bob Lazar!) by kevin
[March 03, 2024, 11:30:06 am]


Re: The Man Who Built UFOs For The CIA (Not Bob Lazar!) by kevin
[March 03, 2024, 11:21:15 am]


Re: The Man Who Built UFOs For The CIA (Not Bob Lazar!) by kevin
[March 03, 2024, 11:16:05 am]


Re: Music You Love by RUSSO
[March 02, 2024, 07:58:09 pm]


Re: Full Interview - Lance Corporal Jonathan Weygandt (1997) by RUSSO
[March 02, 2024, 07:50:59 pm]


Re: The Man Who Built UFOs For The CIA (Not Bob Lazar!) by RUSSO
[March 02, 2024, 07:43:03 pm]


Re: The Man Who Built UFOs For The CIA (Not Bob Lazar!) by RUSSO
[March 02, 2024, 07:41:30 pm]


Re: The Man Who Built UFOs For The CIA (Not Bob Lazar!) by kevin
[March 01, 2024, 11:54:23 am]


Re: The Man Who Built UFOs For The CIA (Not Bob Lazar!) by kevin
[March 01, 2024, 11:34:15 am]