collapse

Author Topic: "Geoengineering" - A Conclusive Photo?  (Read 18530 times)

Offline Amaterasu

  • The Roundtable
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6713
  • Gold 276
  • Information Will Free Us
    • T.A.P. - You're It
Re: "Geoengineering" - A Conclusive Photo?
« Reply #45 on: August 18, 2013, 04:52:38 pm »
That is something that took me some seconds to try to understand what it meant, and I'm not sure that I did. :)

It's a contraction of "It's alright."  Were You close?
"If the universe is made of mostly Dark Energy...can We use it to run Our cars?"

"If You want peace, take the profit out of war."

Offline ArMaP

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13171
  • Gold 770
Re: "Geoengineering" - A Conclusive Photo?
« Reply #46 on: August 18, 2013, 04:55:03 pm »
It's a contraction of "It's alright."  Were You close?
Yes, that's what I thought it was, but it took me some time.

That's one side effect of not talking in English, although I read and write it every day. :)

Offline zorgon

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 21309
  • Gold 903
Re: "Geoengineering" - A Conclusive Photo?
« Reply #47 on: August 18, 2013, 05:02:06 pm »

oh sigh
if pimander was here he'd be pulling his hair out at this off topic
(does anyone know where he went?)

To a barber to get his hair replaced?   ::)

The occasional off topic post is really not a big issue as long as its not drawn out and is usually unavoidable.  Most threads wander off topic once the main point and presentation has been made. At Association of Trolls and Skeptic :p I used to read the OP then skim the thread for any more posts that dealt with the topic... After that the rest was usually not worth reading anyway

Offline zorgon

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 21309
  • Gold 903
Re: "Geoengineering" - A Conclusive Photo?
« Reply #48 on: August 18, 2013, 05:06:20 pm »
ok that search feature is more menace than help..got choked and tossed
grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

yes I would love to remove it

It not only tosses YOU but locks up the database

The way to use it is this...

1) Be on the FORUM MENU PAGE  as it searches below not up from where you are

2) type in only a few words....

3) use "____"

example I was looking for my post on red rain...

Putting red rain into search brings up ALL posts that have 'red and/or 'rain'

searching for "red rain" or "red rain Zorgon"  brought up the thread at the top of the list

I will add this to forum Tips


I need to change that search to a google internal search

Offline burntheships

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2782
  • Gold 277
Re: "Geoengineering" - A Conclusive Photo?
« Reply #49 on: August 18, 2013, 06:35:57 pm »
roofs collapsing from snow and ice.or just my imagination.

No not your imagination, aside the facts/proofs
that it happens, areas that get this very wet heavy snow...
I have concerns about the nano particles as well.

Do I think they are spraying us like ants to wipe us out?
No, although I know they can.

I imagine, as some have admitted; those being in the
black world such as Booze Allen Hamilton, and
other Aerospace companies; that they are controlling
the weather and have a few applications that are for
melting the Arctic Ice so they can finally mine that
area rich in resrouces....they use it for steering
storms, and much more.

Amy, I agree with you,
I can not imagine that any of that is good for us
to breathe, so there are consequences to us,
as well as the earths natural ecosystems,
and weather patterns.

This of course is my opinion, based on
commentary by those in Aerospace, and
research for years in technical papers,
and the progress of those with shill voices
and the alarmist calls for geoengeering.

As a result of this research on my part,
shared with others who have found technical
papers and follow the money trail, the
propaganda trail laid out by these mad
scientists who have a burning desire
to geoengineer the atmosphere....
I am no longer looking at you tube, and
pictures. Not that these thiings are irrelevant,
it is just that the conclusive proof is nary to be
found there.
« Last Edit: August 18, 2013, 06:55:00 pm by burntheships »
"This is the Documentary Channel"
- Zorgon

Offline Amaterasu

  • The Roundtable
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6713
  • Gold 276
  • Information Will Free Us
    • T.A.P. - You're It
Re: "Geoengineering" - A Conclusive Photo?
« Reply #50 on: August 18, 2013, 07:38:45 pm »
There's more and more reports of trees going into distress.  One clue is when an older tree starts putting out new growth near the bottom.  A number of trees here are doing that...

They have tested soil outside houses and underneath them and the difference in the particulates found was astronomical - virtually none beneath the houses, high levels from outside.  Something clearly has been sprayed.

And again...  No One ASKED US!
"If the universe is made of mostly Dark Energy...can We use it to run Our cars?"

"If You want peace, take the profit out of war."

Offline burntheships

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2782
  • Gold 277
Re: "Geoengineering" - A Conclusive Photo?
« Reply #51 on: August 18, 2013, 07:54:41 pm »

They have tested soil outside houses and underneath them and the difference in the particulates found was astronomical - virtually none beneath the houses, high levels from outside.  Something clearly has been sprayed.


Amy, this is interesting....something I have not heard of and
it does make sense. Testing, an expense most of us do not
have financial resources for....and those that do test are ridiculed
and marginilized by the naysay group.

"This is the Documentary Channel"
- Zorgon

Offline Amaterasu

  • The Roundtable
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6713
  • Gold 276
  • Information Will Free Us
    • T.A.P. - You're It
Re: "Geoengineering" - A Conclusive Photo?
« Reply #52 on: August 18, 2013, 08:11:26 pm »
Yup.  The naysayers'll get Ya every time.  They just cannot believe that They would be sprayed like bugs.
"If the universe is made of mostly Dark Energy...can We use it to run Our cars?"

"If You want peace, take the profit out of war."

Offline burntheships

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2782
  • Gold 277
Re: "Geoengineering" - A Conclusive Photo?
« Reply #53 on: August 18, 2013, 08:55:11 pm »
Was looking for this info, found it.


Quote
Few in the civil sector fully understand that geoengineering is primarily a military science and has nothing to do with either cooling the planet or lowering carbon emissions (Report, 6 February). While seemingly fantastical, weather has been weaponised. At least four countries – the US, Russia, China and Israel – possess the technology and organisation to regularly alter weather and geologic events for various military and black operations, which are tied to secondary objectives, including demographic, energy and agricultural resource management.

Indeed, warfare now includes the technological ability to induce, enhance or direct cyclonic events, earthquakes, draught and flooding, including the use of polymerised aerosol viral agents and radioactive particulates carried through global weather systems. Various themes in public debate, including global warming, have unfortunately been subsumed into much larger military and commercial objectives that have nothing to do with broad public environmental concerns. These include the gradual warming of polar regions to facilitate naval navigation and resource extraction.
Matt Andersson
Former executive adviser, aerospace & defence, Booz Allen Hamilton, Chicago
 
http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2012/feb/09/at-war-over-geoengineering

Long before The Gaurdian began the Snowden interviews,
it was publishing highly controversial comments.


Quote
Matt Andersson - Indigo Aerospace


 http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/01a5e67e-9f62-11e1-a455-00144feabdc0.html#ixzz2cNqMzGjz

 
From Mr Matt Andersson.
 
Interestingly, the FT’s recent coverage of corporate aviation (Special Report, May 14) accurately states that Berkshire Hathaway’s NetJets, after years of financial struggle and a recent restructuring, is focused heavily in its 10-year plan on long-haul operations. In both segments, it may be that international operations is where the money is.
 
The last hold-out in global aviation deregulation, of course, may be cross-border co-operation, ownership and merger restrictions (notably, Chile and Brazil recently overcame them), the final lifting of which may be aviation’s holy grail.

Matt Andersson, Indigo Aerospace Chicago, IL, US
 
"This is the Documentary Channel"
- Zorgon

 


Wal-Mart.com USA, LLC
affiliate_link
Free Click Tracking
Wal-Mart.com USA, LLC

* Recent Posts

Re: Music You Love by RUSSO
[Today at 02:12:02 am]


Re: kits to feed your family for a year by Shasta56
[March 17, 2024, 12:40:48 pm]


Re: kits to feed your family for a year by space otter
[March 16, 2024, 08:45:27 pm]


Re: kits to feed your family for a year by Shasta56
[March 16, 2024, 07:24:38 pm]


Re: kits to feed your family for a year by space otter
[March 16, 2024, 10:41:21 am]


Re: Full Interview - Lance Corporal Jonathan Weygandt (1997) by RUSSO
[March 12, 2024, 07:22:56 pm]


Re: Full Interview - Lance Corporal Jonathan Weygandt (1997) by RUSSO
[March 09, 2024, 03:25:56 am]


Re: Full Interview - Lance Corporal Jonathan Weygandt (1997) by RUSSO
[March 09, 2024, 02:33:38 am]


Re: Music You Love by RUSSO
[March 09, 2024, 01:10:22 am]


Re: The Man Who Built UFOs For The CIA (Not Bob Lazar!) by RUSSO
[March 09, 2024, 12:14:14 am]


Re: Full Interview - Lance Corporal Jonathan Weygandt (1997) by RUSSO
[March 09, 2024, 12:08:46 am]


Re: A peculiar stone in DeForest by Canine
[March 03, 2024, 11:54:22 am]


Re: The Man Who Built UFOs For The CIA (Not Bob Lazar!) by kevin
[March 03, 2024, 11:30:06 am]


Re: The Man Who Built UFOs For The CIA (Not Bob Lazar!) by kevin
[March 03, 2024, 11:21:15 am]


Re: The Man Who Built UFOs For The CIA (Not Bob Lazar!) by kevin
[March 03, 2024, 11:16:05 am]


Re: Music You Love by RUSSO
[March 02, 2024, 07:58:09 pm]


Re: Full Interview - Lance Corporal Jonathan Weygandt (1997) by RUSSO
[March 02, 2024, 07:50:59 pm]


Re: The Man Who Built UFOs For The CIA (Not Bob Lazar!) by RUSSO
[March 02, 2024, 07:43:03 pm]


Re: The Man Who Built UFOs For The CIA (Not Bob Lazar!) by RUSSO
[March 02, 2024, 07:41:30 pm]


Re: The Man Who Built UFOs For The CIA (Not Bob Lazar!) by kevin
[March 01, 2024, 11:54:23 am]