Note to the government: When you unilaterally send aircraft to spray unfamiliar chemicals over residential areas, the public will get very worried. Environmental activists will pick through mounds of official documents in an attempt to make sense of what you are doing: Will it affect our health?
Excerpt from LBAMspray.com:
Check this MSDS from Dupont one of the 3 ingredients listed includes "1,2-BENZISOTHIAZOLIN-3-ONE" which is in LBAM-F. See Page 2 under "Potential Health Effects" "SIGNS AND SYMPTOMS EFFECTS OF ACUTE OVEREXPOSURE: High oral doses can cause apathy (lack of feeling or emotion)."
Even if you have the best intentions, to eradicate a tiny moth that could destroy dozens of fruit crops, be prepared to explain your plans, and seek the approval of the public, before getting started with such a controversial program.
MARKETS:
• Firefighting
• Oil Spill Containment
• Weather Modification :o
• Biochemical Decontamination
The Evergreen Supertanker is not just limited to fighting fire. It will be a true utilitarian aircraft with the capability to configure to different applications on short notice. This multimission aircraft can support sensitive security and environmental missions. The aircraft’s exceptional drop capabilities, loiter time and size make it an ideal tool to perform challenging homeland security missions, able to neutralize chemical attacks on military installments or major population centers, and help control large, environmentally disastrous oil spills.
In addition, the upper deck of the Boeing 747 provides over 200 square feet of space that could be assigned as a command and control center. EIA possesses an FAA exemption number 1870C that permits the carriage of up to five individuals that are not crewmembers in the upper deck. This area is capable of providing space for command and control components that would assist in sophisticated mapping, incident monitoring and video/communications downlink relay that might require additional personnel over and above the required crew.
Water is prized in western Kansas, where aquifers are suffering and farms are miles wide and generations deep; a scant half inch of rain can mean the difference between a successful season and a failed one.
But when it comes in the form of fist-sized balls of ice known as hail, water's more than a menace. It can damage and even destroy crops.
That's where the Western Kansas Weather Modification Program and other cloud-seeding operations across the western U.S. come in. The WKWMP is among about 10 programs that tinker with the weather — either by trying to cut the size of hail or boost rainfall and snowpack. They do it largely by shooting up storm clouds with silver iodide or dry ice mixtures.
Originally posted by tiderious
I saw this craft parked on the flightline for the better part of a year. It never seemed to move. I never saw it taxi, take off, or land. Or in the process of any of those.
Sometimes, it would just be gone. And i thought it must have moved on to some other base. but then it would show back up again after a couple of days.
Always seemed like a really odd plane to me. i never found out what its purpose was.
From: Craig Roberts
On the 135s, that photo was emailed to me and looked very bizarre as I used to work on 707s and know the fuel tank vents are in the wingtips. I sent this along to a friend who is in the 'right place' and he did an analysis. His response came in this morning: the airplane is a Navy TACAMO electronic command and control plane. It has NO room for extra fuel to spray, and the fuel vents were relocated to the inboard points because of all the antennas that are now in the wingtips. I'll email his response, including the Boeing site.
In 1998 the U.S. Air Force introduced JP-8+100, an improved JP-8 fuel with a "fuel injector cleaner" (additive) that reduces fouling/coking in engine fuel controls, mainburner fuel nozzles, manifolds and augmentor sprayrings/spraybars and reduces smoke and soot in older engines. To initiate its transition, the JP-8 specification (MIL-T-83133D) was amended to allow limited use of the additive.
Scientists now admit that emissions from aircraft are forming artificial clouds that block out the sun, precisely what geoengineering advocates like top eugenicist and White House science advisor John P. Holdren have called for, but the article tries to insinuate that the effect is caused by natural “vapours,” when in reality it can be attributed to chemtrails that contain substances harmful to humans.
The phones started ringing around 7:30 pm EDT on Saturday night, Sept. 19th. All along the US Atlantic seaboard, police stations and news desks received reports of strange lights in the sky. John A. Blackwell of Exeter, New Hampshire, snapped this picture of the phenomenon:
"It was an impressive display," says Blackwell. "To the naked eye, it was visible for about a minute."
It looks like a passing comet or a giant, luminous amoeba. But this was pure rocket science. The cloud was created by a Black Brant XII sounding rocket launched from NASA's Wallops Flight Facility in Virginia. The rocket released a cloud of electrically-charged aerosols near the top of Earth's atmosphere to investigate the formation of noctilucent clouds or "NLCs." Mysterious NLCs form naturally around Earth's poles during the months of northern summer. On this September evening, researchers decided to see if they could create an artificial NLC at mid-latitudes; it seems to have worked.
Ground-based cameras and radars along the Atlantic coast monitored the experiment while the STPSat-1 satellite watched from Earth orbit. Principal investigators at the Naval Research Lab hope the data will reveal much about the microphysics of noctilucent clouds and the possible role of rockets in creating them.
The rocket launched at around 7:30 pm (Eastern Time) from the NASA Wallops Flight Facility. It was a four stage rocket and you could see each stage ignite one after another. About four minutes after the launch, it released it's charged aerosol payload to create artificial noctilucent clouds. The release formed an impressive, bright cone shaped cloud. Photo Details: Canon EOS Rebel XSi, 200 ASA, 30s Exposure
I can see 'The Eye in the Sky' in that photo. 8-)
Alaska Science Forum
March 3, 1976
International Barium Releases
Article #28
by T. Neil Davis
This column is provided as a public service by the Geophysical Institute, University of Alaska Fairbanks, in cooperation with the UAF research community. T. Neil Davis is a seismologist at the institute.
Strange lights seen in Alaskan skies on late February and early March 1978 evenings have a reasonable explanation. These were chemical releases performed at high altitude aboard rockets flown from the University's Poker Flat rocket range near Fairbanks.
The two most beautiful sequences, on February 27 and March l, were conducted by a group of Danish scientists, the first truly international users of Alaska's scientific rocket range.
Each Danish rocket released a chemical called trimethylaluminate (TMA, for short) as it sped upward through altitude 80 km (50 miles). At this altitude the rocket was still in darkness and the TMA formed a yellowish trail. Then as the rocket entered sunlight, the TMA being released glowed a beautiful blue color.
By photographing the deformation of the TMA trail with cameras at Arctic Village, Fort Yukon and Fairbanks, the Danish scientists measured the wind in the region through which the rocket was flying.
A minute or so later, the rocket released a puff of barium gas. The barium release soon formed two clouds that drifted apart. One part, composed of ionized barium, drifted away westward under the influence of the electric field in the high atmosphere. Thus by tracking it, the Danes could measure the electric field. Two more barium releases and then a second TMA release, performed as the rocket fell back toward the earth, allowed additional measurements of the wind and electric field over an extended region above Alaska.
The highest barium releases were at altitude 270 km, high enough to be easily seen all over Alaska and western Canada wherever the sky was clear.
People have wondered if there was a connection between the barium releases and the extensive auroras that occurred throughout each night following the chemical release. The answer is yes, but the releases did not cause the aurora. It was the other way around. By observing with various instruments, it was known that extensive auroras were already occurring over Alaska when the releases were made in evening twilight. Since the objective was to measure the effects of the aurora on the high-altitude winds, the rockets were purposely flown during times of extensive naturally occurring aurora.
Originally posted by valandur
I've been saving this story that aired on a local news channel a few years ago.
Link- http://www.ksla.com/Global/story.asp?S=7339345
CHEMTRAILS: Is U.S. Gov't. Secretly Testing Americans 'Again'?
(http://ksla.images.worldnow.com/images/7339345_BG1.jpg)
Posted: Nov 09, 2007 6:46 PM CST Updated: Dec 21, 2007 6:17 PM CST
Could a strange substance found by an Ark-La-Tex man be part of secret government testing program? That's the question at the heart of a phenomenon called "Chemtrails." In a KSLA News 12 investigation, Reporter Jeff Ferrell shows us the results of testing we had done about what's in our skies. "It seemed like some mornings it was just criss-crossing the whole sky. It was just like a giant checkerboard," described Bill Nichols. He snapped several photos of the strange clouds from his home in Stamps, in southwest Arkansas. Nichols said these unusual clouds begin as normal contrails from a jet engine. But unlike normal contrails, these do 'not' fade away.
Soon after a recent episode he saw particles in the air. "We'd see it drop to the ground in a haze," added Nichols. He then noticed the material collecting on the ground. "This is water and stuff that I collected in bowls. I had it sitting out in my backyard in my dad's pick-up truck," said Nichols as he handed us a mason jar in the KSLA News 12 parking lot back in September after driving down from Arkansas.
KSLA News 12 had the sample tested at a lab. The results: A high level of barium, 6.8 parts per million, (ppm). That's more than three times the toxic level set by the Environmental Protection Agency, or EPA. Armed with these lab results about the high levels of barium found in our sample, we decided to contact the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality. They told us that, 'yes,' these levels are very unusual. But at the same time they added the caveat that proving the source is a whole 'nother matter. We discovered during our investigation that Barium is a hallmark of other chemtrail testing. This phenomenon even attracted the attention of a Los Angeles network affiliate, which aired a report entitled, "Toxic Sky?"
There's already no shortage of unclassified weather modification programs by the government. But those who fear chemtrails could be secret biological and chemical testing on the public point to the 1977 U.S. Senate hearings which confirmed 239 populated areas had been contaminated with biological agents between 1949 and 1969. Later, the 1994 Rockefeller Report concluded hundreds of thousands of military personnel were also subjected to secret biological experiments over the last 60-years.
But could secret testing be underway yet again? "I'd rather it be something inert and you know something that's not causing any damage but I'd like to know what it is," concluded Nichols. KSLA News 12 discovered chemtrails are even mentioned by name in the initial draft of HR 2977 back in 2001, under the Space Preservation Act. But the military denies any such program exists. It turns out, until just nine years ago the government had the right, under U.S. law, to conduct secret testing on the American public, under specific conditions. Only a public outcry repealed part of that law, with some "exceptions."
Mark Ryan, Director of the Poison Control Center, explained that short term exposure to barium can lead to anything from stomach to chest pains, with long-term exposure causing blood pressure problems. Ryan addressed concerns by chemtrail researchers that barium could be meant to wear down a person's immune system. "Anything that causes ill effects on the body long-term, chronically, is going to affect your ability, it's just constantly working on the body. So from that aspect yeah it's a potential."
Ryan told us he's conducted research of his own about secret government testing on the public. But he's still a bit skeptical about chemtrails at the moment, especially considering that his Poison Control Center has seen no calls about barium exposure.
Story by Jeff Ferrell
===============================================
Judging by the scorching summer we are having where I am, the fallacy that this is being done to somehow prevent "global warming" needs to be exposed because obviously it's NOT working!
Valandur
One question I have if I may: In your opinion why are these people doing what they are doing? I mean to say why spray harmful chemicals over populated areas?
This whole chemtrail issue is related to the plan for decreasing the world population to around 450-500 million -- and starting with the US first.
Originally posted by swingarm
Thank you for extensive amount of research. Weedwacker , Essan and Ozweatherman would be speechless ;)
Another good site I remember looking at a few years back was
http://www.willthomas.net/chemtrails/index.htm
Originally posted by easynow
great thread Zorgon and a fascinating subject to say the least,
all this has me wondering if the X-37 orbital vehicle is participating in these upper atmosphere experiments ? seems plausible to me since the mission is secret and if the X-37 is carrying a payload for Charged Aerosol Release, experiments could be conducted whenever they wanted and nobody would be the wiser because it's already up there ! ???QuoteIn 2025, uninhabited aerospace vehicles (UAV) are routinely used for weather-modification operations. By cross-referencing desired attack times with wind and thunderstorm forecasts and the SPOT satellite's projected orbit, the WFSE generates mission profiles for each UAV. The WFSE guides each UAV using near-real-time information from a networked sensor array.
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread59283/pg1
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread59281/pg1
Original post by easynowQuoteauthor spacemaverick
@easynow, interesting theory regarding the X-37. The vehcile can be used various purposes but this could surely be one, maybe? I believe the possibility exist. I believe it is a multipurpose platform to say the least. (my opinion of course)
no doubt the X-37 is a multipurpose vehicle and makes perfect sense it's involved with upper atmosphere experiments. obviously the M.I.C. is working on weapons applications of weather modification and EMF charged particles in the upper atmosphere which coincidently is right where the X-37 operates.
i'm also wondering if "HAARP" replaced the need for nuclear detonations in the upper atmosphere ? i think "Operation Argus" was the beginning of these UHF/VHF/EMF research experiments and it seems the HAARP weapon can covertly produce the same kind of results without the fallout(?) and without alerting the Public. :oQuoteOperation Argus was the only clandestine test series in the 17 year history of atmospheric testing. It was secretly conducted in the South Atlantic, 1100 miles southwest of Capetown, South Africa. Argus consisted of three very high altitude test shots of the W-25 warhead to investigate the effects of nuclear explosions outside of the atmosphere - how the charged particles and radioactive isotopes released would interact with the Earth's magnetic field which could potentially interfere with radar tracking, communications, and the electronics of satellites and ballistic missiles. l
http://nuclearweaponarchive.org/Usa/Tests/Argus.htm
[youtube]YZu7et1dZlA[/youtube]
originally posted by Somamech
Even though some of the guys and gals I work/worked with/know as friends with were fighting on different sides, none of them have any respect for Agent Orange.
Originally posted byvectorian
harmful to the ozone layer that protects earth.
Originally posted by whisperagct
In your opinion why are these people doing what they are doing? I mean to say why spray harmful chemicals over populated areas?
Originally posted by boondock-saint
has anybody done any research into
Project Cloverleaf ????[/color]
Originally posted by valandur
This was posted in another forum, it certainly gives some little talked about answers to why they are spraying people with aluminum and barium. Ah Monsanto is so evil.....
Valandur
Originally posted by slaveearth
Investigative reporters and film producers G. Edward Griffin and Mike Murphy presented evidence and theories behind the phenomenon of chemtrails, which are said to be caused by chemical or biological agents deliberately sprayed into the atmosphere by planes. Griffin differentiated chemtrails from jet contrails, noting that contrails (condensation trails) dissipate quickly in the air, while chemtrails linger for some time.
The two pointed toward geoengineering (weather modification) as a rapidly developing industry that is experimenting with aerial spraying/chemtrails. Murphy cited the US Military's report Owning the Weather in 2025 (PDF file), and connected the spraying with massive amounts of aluminum, barium, and strontium found in snow, rain, and soil samples in places like Mount Shasta. For more on test results, he recommended the site geoengineeringwatch.org. He also talked about declining organic farming in Hawaii, and suggested that chemtrails might be damaging crops in order to force farmers to use GMO seeds.
http://www.coasttocoastam.com/show/2010/10/11
In describing a plane's typical chemtrail mission, "we see them in the morning...going back and forth in the sky, and behind them we see the long trails that persist," said Murphy, who noted that this is a global operation that sometimes involves UN planes, and many different governments. They are traversing the sky where there are no regular flight patterns, Griffin added. The agenda of those using chemtrails likely extends beyond
Originally Posted by malkor
yikes.
here's a thought.
step 1. dump aluminum and barium into the soil on the pretext of saving us from global warming.
step 2. place monsanto's man as fda food czar.
http://www.grist.org/article/2009-07-08-monsanto-FDA-taylor
step 3. then, with the authority gained from bill S 510, outlaw individual farming because the soil is too toxic and it's a national health hazard.
http://www.naturalnews.com/030418_Food_Safety_Modernization_Act_seeds.html
what do you think, too over the edge?
Originally posted by valandur
I've been saving this story that aired on a local news channel a few years ago.
Link- http://www.ksla.com/Global/story.asp?S=7339345
CHEMTRAILS: Is U.S. Gov't. Secretly Testing Americans 'Again'?
Risky Climate Techno-fixes Blocked
NAGOYA, Japan – In a landmark consensus decision, the 193-member UN Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) will close its tenth biennial meeting with a de facto moratorium on geoengineering projects and experiments. “Any private or public experimentation or adventurism intended to manipulate the planetary thermostat will be in violation of this carefully crafted UN consensus,” stated Silvia Ribeiro, Latin American Director of ETC Group.
The agreement, reached during the ministerial portion of the two-week meeting which included 110 environment ministers, asks governments to ensure that no geoengineering activities take place until risks to the environmental and biodiversity and associated social, cultural and economic impacts risks have been appropriately considered as well as the socio-economic impacts. The CBD secretariat was also instructed to report back on various geoengineering proposals and potential intergovernmental regulatory measures.
The unusually strong consensus decision builds on the 2008 moratorium on ocean fertilization. That agreement, negotiated at COP 9 in Bonn, put the brakes on a litany of failed “experiments” – both public and private – to sequester atmospheric carbon dioxide in the oceans’ depths by spreading nutrients on the sea surface. Since then, attention has turned to a range of futuristic proposals to block a percentage of solar radiation via large-scale interventions in the atmosphere, stratosphere and outer space that would alter global temperatures and precipitation patterns.
“This decision clearly places the governance of geoengineering in the United Nations where it belongs,” said ETC Group Executive Director Pat Mooney.
“This decision is a victory for common sense, and for precaution. It will not inhibit legitimate scientific research. Decisions on geoengineering cannot be made by small groups of scientists from a small group of countries that establish self-serving ‘voluntary guidelines’ on climate hacking. What little credibility such efforts may have had in some policy circles in the global North has been shattered by this decision. The UK Royal Society and its partners should cancel their Solar Radiation Management Governance Initiative and respect that the world’s governments have collectively decided that future deliberations on geoengineering should take place in the UN, where all countries have a seat at the table and where civil society can watch and influence what they are doing.”
Delegates in Nagoya have now clearly understood the potential threat that deployment – or even field testing – of geoengineering technologies poses to the protection of biodiversity. The decision was hammered out in long and difficult late night sessions of a “Friends of the chair” group, attended by ETC Group, and adopted by the Working Group 1 Plenary on 27 October 2010. The Chair of the climate and biodiversity negotiations called the final text “a highly delicate compromise.” All that remains to do now is gavel it through in the final plenary at 6 PM Friday (Nagoya time).
“The decision is not perfect,” said Neth Dano of ETC Group Philippines. “Some delegations are understandably concerned that the interim definition of geoengineering is too narrow because it does not include Carbon Capture and Storage technologies. Before the next CBD meeting, there will be ample opportunity to consider these questions in more detail. But climate techno-fixes are now firmly on the UN agenda and will lead to important debates as the 20th anniversary of the Earth Summit approaches. A change of course is essential, and geoengineering is clearly not the way forward.”
In 1979, physicist Freeman Dyson, a well known theoretical physicist and mathematician, proposed deliberate, large-scale introduction of fine particles into the upper atmosphere to offset global warming. In the 90's, Edward Teller, a physicist and fellow of the renowned Hoover Institute, expounded on the idea of spreading fine particulates into the atmosphere as a means of reflecting roughly 1% of the sun's rays back into space.
While the government is reluctant to admit anything, there has been increasing evidence regarding operations that have been carried out within and outside the U.S., based on the recommendations and theories of Dyson and Teller.
Originally posted by treeshaker
What do yall think about the black-line chemtrail phenomena?
(http://www.addmypics.com/host-images/i1859_chemtrailblackline.jpg)
Oh and I almost forgot!
Do you know that I was told that there is a link between agent orange and autism. This was told to me by a Doctor.... :o
Originally posted by treeshaker
Thanks for the reply zorgon.. That's what I thought...
Venus! How and the world did those get there? Tell me it was one of our probes and not the folks that live there.... :o
Thanks!
In 1997, Edward Teller co-authored a white paper, “Prospects for physics-based modulation of global change”, where he advocated the large-scale introduction of metal particulates into the upper atmosphere to apply an effective “sun screen”. A subsequent series of tests to create a polymarised and ionised mixture of certain metals, including aluminium, barium, thorium and selenium, among other contents, was perfected and tested in US facilities. A joint public-private operation, initially called “Cloverleaf”, was operationalised and subsequently supported by US state and federal weather modification legislature.
Throughout the continental US, dozens of tanker and other aircraft are daily applying thousands of gallons of aerosol nano-particulates that serve several objectives, including the purported ability to reflect UV radiation. Similar operations are being conducted in Canada and parts of Europe.
Originally posted by valandur
Lots of really good information in this video...
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DTxvWLrUeE8[/youtube]
Her web site(s) contain all of the data she refers to in the vid.
http://www.californiaskywatch.com/
http://www.agriculturedefensecoalition.org/
Here are the links to Intra flights that she mentions in the video -
links to the .pdf files that show the data that Mrs. Peterson highlights on the flight maps she received from Congressman Thompson.
Taken from - http://www.californiaskywatch.com/content/jet-trails
25F 2003 FAA Commercial Jet Flights Arriving Bay Area Airports July 17 2003 FAA Flight Records Page 6.pdf (http://www.californiaskywatch.com/sites/default/files/file/pdfs/25F_2003_FAA_Commercial_Jet_Flights_Arriving_Bay_Area_Airports_July_17_2003_FAA_Flight_Records_Page_6.pdf)
25F 2003 FAA Commercial Jet Flights Arriving Leaving Area Airports Intraflights July 17 2003 FAA Flight Map Page 5.pdf (http://www.californiaskywatch.com/sites/default/files/file/pdfs/25F_2003_FAA_Commercial_Jet_Flights_Arriving_Leaving_Area_Airports_Intraflights_July_17_2003_FAA_Flight_Map_Page_5.pdf)
25F 2003 FAA Commercial Jet Flights Departing Bay Area Airports July 17 2003 FAA Flight Map Page 7.pdf (http://www.californiaskywatch.com/sites/default/files/file/pdfs/25F_2003_FAA_Commercial_Jet_Flights_Departing_Bay_Area_Airports_July_17_2003_FAA_Flight_Map_Page_7.pdf)
25F 2003 FAA Commercial Jet Flights Yellow Shows Intra Flights July 17 2003 FAA Map Page 4.pdf (http://www.californiaskywatch.com/sites/default/files/file/pdfs/25F_2003_FAA_Commercial_Jet_Flights_Yellow_Shows_Intra_Flights_July_17_2003_FAA_Map_Page_4.pdf)
Multiple Persistent Spreading Contrails
This is a fairly common sight on the East Coast, where lots and lots of airplanes fly between the major cities of the Eastern Seaboard. However this photo captures a wonderful display of these contrails, showing them at various stages of "spreading".
View from the Air
On the same day and in the same area as above, here is a view from the air. This is taken on a southbound flight over North Carolina at 9:45 am on Feb. 20, 2004. From this perspective, one can see the large number of contrails from the morning's air traffic being carried slowly eastward over the Atlantic Ocean by the prevailing winds.
Criss-crossing contrails
This photo shows a series of contrails creating a cross-hatch pattern across the sky. It was taken in spring 2004 near the town of Chartres, France. This is not too far from Paris.
On Dec. 6, New York’s Suffolk County government will hold a public hearing on a proposal to ban aerial spraying of aluminum oxide, barium, sulfur, and other salts into the air over the county without first filing an Environmental Impact Statement with and receiving approval from the county’s Department of Health Services, Division of Environmental Quality.
Exempted from the proposed ban are aerosol spraying operations for agriculture, and for lyme disease, Eastern equine encephalitis (EEE), West Nile virus (WNV), and other disease vector control operations.
The hearing will be held at the Riverhead Legislative Auditorium, Evans K. Griffing Building, 300 Center Drive in Riverhead, NY at 2:30 pm.........
..........“If this proposal becomes law in Suffolk County, Long Island, it would be the first in the nation. It would be a starting point for others to follow,” said LISW in a press release.
“Eventually, our governments would have to investigate why our trees are dying in record numbers; why our waters contain toxic levels of aluminum, barium and strontium; why 90% of us are vitamin D deficient; why our crops are failing; and where all of this crazy weather is coming from.”
Cindy Pikoulas of LISW spoke with New York Sky Watch radio on Nov. 20, when she advised that tree samples from Suffolk show high levels of barium, strontium and aluminum. She is asking Long Islanders to have their water and trees tested for these chemicals in order to build a body of evidence that would spur investigations by health and environment authorities.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=27866
Below is the full text of Suffolk’s proposed legislation: WHEREAS, there was duly presented and introduced to this County Legislature at a meeting held on [December 6], 2011, a proposed local law entitled, "A LOCAL LAW TO PROTECT AIR QUALITY IN SUFFOLK COUNTY" now, therefore, be it
RESOLVED, that said local law be enacted in form as follows:
LOCAL LAW NO. _____-2011, SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK
A LOCAL LAW TO PROTECT AIR QUALITY IN SUFFOLK COUNTY
BE IT ENACTED BY THE COUNTY LEGISLATURE OF THE COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, as follows:
Section 1. Legislative Intent.
This Legislature hereby finds and determines that Suffolk County is a leader in environmental protection and has several programs to protect soil and groundwater from contamination.
This Legislature also finds and determines that air pollution is another environmental issue that can impact the health and safety of County residents and may also contaminate soil and groundwater.
This Legislature further finds and determines that concerns have been raised that business and government entities may be discharging polluting chemicals, including barium, sulfur, salts, and aluminum oxide, into the air, which may impact weather and other environmental elements.
This Legislature finds that such particulates eventually fall from the atmosphere, exposing the public to these air pollutants and, upon landing, may contaminate soil and water.
This Legislature determines that County residents may be exposed to these chemicals while they are in the atmosphere, which can cause respiratory and other health problems.
This Legislature also finds that, to protect County residents from potential harm, any person who plans to discharge these chemicals into the airspace over Suffolk County should first file an Environmental Impact Statement with and receive approval from the Department of Health Services, Division of Environmental Quality.
Therefore, the purpose of this law is to require any person who plans to discharge sulfur, barium, salts or aluminum oxide into the airspace above the County of Suffolk to file a complete Environmental Impact Statement with the County prior to taking such action.
Section 2. Definitions.
As used in this law, the following terms shall have the meanings indicated: “PERSON” shall mean any natural person, individual, corporation, unincorporated association, proprietorship, firm, partnership, joint venture, joint stock association, or other entity or business of any kind.
Section 3. Requirements.
Any person who plans to discharge sulfur, barium, salts or aluminum oxide into the airspace above the County of Suffolk must file a completed environmental impact form, as established in Section 4 of this law, with the Suffolk County Department of Health Services, Division of Environmental Quality and with the Clerk of the Suffolk County Legislature and receive the approval of the Division of Environmental Quality prior to engaging in such discharge.
Section 4. Form Established.
The Department of Health Services, Division of Environmental Quality is hereby authorized, empowered and directed to develop an environmental impact form to be used by persons wishing to discharge sulfur, barium, salts or aluminum oxide into the airspace above the County of Suffolk. Such form shall require applicants to detail the nature and purpose of their proposed discharge and any potential environmental and/or public health impacts that may result from such discharge.
Section 5. Exemption.
The requirements set forth in this law shall not apply to any person engaging in aerosol spraying for agricultural or vector control purposes.
Section 6. Penalties.
A. Any person who violates any provision of this law shall be liable for a civil penalty of up to $2,500 for an initial violation, with a fine of $5,000 for each subsequent violation.
B. Any civil penalty may only be assessed by the Commissioner of Health Services following a hearing and opportunity for an alleged violator to be heard.
Section 7. Rules and Regulations.
The Commissioner of the County Department of Health Services is hereby authorized and empowered to issue and promulgate such rules and regulations as he or she deems necessary to implement and carry out the provisions of this law. Section 8. Applicability.
This law shall apply to all actions occurring on or after the effective date of this law.
Section 9. Severability.
If any clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, section, or part of this law or the application thereof to any person, individual, corporation, firm, partnership, entity, or circumstance shall be adjudged by any court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid or unconstitutional, such order or judgment shall not affect, impair, or invalidate the remainder thereof, but shall be confined in its operation to the clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, section, or part of this law, or in its application to the person, individual, corporation, firm, partnership, entity, or circumstance directly involved in the controversy in which such order or judgment shall be rendered.
Section 10. SEQRA Determination.
This Legislature, being the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) lead agency, hereby finds and determines that this law constitutes a Type II action pursuant to Section 617.5(c)(20), (21), and/or (27) of Title 6 of the NEW YORK CODE OF RULES AND REGULATIONS (6 NYCRR) and within the meaning of Section 8-0109(2) of the NEW YORK ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION LAW as a promulgation of regulations, rules, policies, procedures, and legislative decisions in connection with continuing agency administration, management and information collection. The Suffolk County Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) is hereby directed to circulate any appropriate SEQRA notices of determination of non-applicability or non-significance in accordance with this law.
Section 11. Effective Date.
This law shall take effect immediately upon filing in the Office of the Secretary of State.
A controversial theory is gaining popularity-- a theory that has some saying those contrails are the government using the sky as their own personal chemistry experiment; an experiment that some fear is dangerous.
The technical term is Geo-engineering.
"The plans to put chemicals into the atmosphere will pollute our air, our water and our soil."
President of the Agriculture Defense Coalition Rosalind Peterson says chemicals are being sprayed into the air via jet planes, all in an attempt to combat global warming.
"They’re changing our climate and they're reducing the amount of sunlight that's reaching the earth,” says Peterson.........
........Peterson says because of geo-engineering, less direct sunlight makes its way into the atmosphere causing massive deficiencies of Vitamin D among humans.
She says rickets and other childhood diseases are on the rise as a result of the lack of Vitamin D.
All government agencies deny the existence of chemical trails.
Nothing to see here... please move along...
(https://scontent-b-sjc.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn1/t1.0-9/10247333_786946567990328_1171661839822553025_n.jpg)
Very pronounced grid pattern....over the mountains,
and the valley below. I would guess there are few
people in that area....so wonder what those
trails are for.
Sorry forgot to mention that picture was taken over Yosemite National Park
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8X1j58Y6B0s[/youtube]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8X1j58Y6B0s
But, but... Contrails form like that all the time at airports...right? ::)
So They gave up trying to convince Us that there is no such thing as chemtrails, and are now trying to get Us to believe this chemical softkill is "for Our own good."
Sorry, z, if I fail to see the similarity between what You show as wingtip vorteces, and what looked like lingering chemtrails in that vid.
How long do these vortex trails last?
Do You have any vid of this phenomenon?
What I don't understand is why these trails are NOT coming from the wing tips but roughly midway between tip and fuselage...
Contrails really bleedy real with atmospheric conditions, chemtrails are entirely different.
Has anyone else seen trails that are black like this?
(http://i562.photobucket.com/albums/ss64/Micjer_2009/blacklines_zpse6c70d83.png) (http://s562.photobucket.com/user/Micjer_2009/media/blacklines_zpse6c70d83.png.html)
Bit of a non-statement there Toad..
Not at all. You were stating normal condensation contrails were chemtrails.
Chemtrails May Contain Bio-Engineered RFID Chips in the Form of Nano-Fibres, Forced Transhumanism is Here
truther 3
This presentation by Sofia Smallstorm centres around the phenomena that is ‘Chemtrails’ the lingering, clouds of matter that seem to be filling the skies around the world these days.
There are many hypothesis surrounding this subject from mind control to a connection with HAARP and the link to transhumanism, the latter being something I believe to be one of the most important.
I watched the following video and listened to Sofia talking about the bio-engineering connection to Chemtrails and the fact that gels had reportedly rained down after chemtrail spraying, probably the most widely reported was the Joplin Tornado incident, where residents had contracted a strange fungal infection called mucormycosis, she mentioned after having these gels analysed in a laboratory, nano fibres, crystals, red blood cells and semi conductors had been found.
If we then take a look at an overview of RFID components, particularly the passive RFID chips, its conceivable to believe the Nano Fibres mentioned above coupled with the other components mentioned might actually come together to create a nano-scale passive RFID chip inside our bodies:
Overview of RFID Components:
Tags
Tags are the heart of an RFID system, because they store the information that describes the object being
tracked. Specific object information is stored in the memory of tags and is accessed via the radio signal of
RFID readers.