|
April 2002
FORWARD Purpose: DARPA’s charter is to prevent technological surprise from harming U.S. national security by sponsoring revolutionary and innovative high-payoff research. This document provides short summaries of selected DARPA programs in FY 2002 and FY 2003, and it is intended as a ready reference for those interested in DARPA’s research portfolio. To better illustrate the goals of the programs, the programs have been grouped into three broad areas, each with various sub-areas:
There are indexes in the back of the document for finding individual programs and cross-referencing them to Program Elements in the President’s FY 2003 budget. TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| National-Level Problems........................................................................................... | 1 |
| DARPA Support for the Global War on Terrorism................................................... | 1 |
| Operation Enduring Freedom................................................................................ | 1 |
| Operation Noble Eagle......................................................................................... | 1 |
| Information Awareness......................................................................................... | 2 |
| Protection from Biological Warfare Attack................................................................ | 7 |
| Sensors................................................................................................................. | 7 |
| Medical Diagnostics and Countermeasures............................................................. | 8 |
| Building Protection................................................................................................ | 9 |
| Air And Water Purification.................................................................................... | 10 |
| Protection from Information Attack........................................................................... | 10 |
| Maintain Unhindered Access to Space and Protect U.S. Space Capabilities............... | 13 |
| Operational Dominance.......................................................................................... | 16 |
| Affordable, Precision, Moving Target Kill................................................................ | 16 |
| Information Exploitation....................................................................................... | 16 |
| Combined Manned and Unmanned Systems.............................................................. | 19 |
| Future Combat Systems......................................................................................... | 21 |
| Command and Control / Logistics.............................................................................. | 24 |
| Sensors and Sensor Exploitation................................................................................ | 25 |
| Communications....................................................................................................... | 26 |
| Future Warfare Concepts......................................................................................... | 28 |
| Land Warfare and Weaponry................................................................................ | 28 |
| Maritime Operations.............................................................................................. | 30 |
| Air Operations...................................................................................................... | 32 |
| High-Risk, High-Payoff Technologies...................................................................... | 33 |
| Information Technologies........................................................................................... | 33 |
| Networking............................................................................................................. | 33 |
| Network Embedded Technology............................................................................ | 35 |
| Responsive Computing Architecture........................................................................ | 38 |
| Agent-Based Systems............................................................................................. | 38 |
| Biology-Based Technology........................................................................................ | 40 |
| Bio:Info:Micro........................................................................................................ | 40 |
| BioAdaptation........................................................................................................ | 41 |
| Nanostructure in Biology......................................................................................... | 41 |
| Bio-Computation.................................................................................................... | 42 |
| Brain Machine Interface.......................................................................................... | 42 |
| Bioderived Materials............................................................................................... | 43 |
| Biochemical Materials............................................................................................. | 44 |
| BioMagnetics......................................................................................................... | 44 |
| Electronics Technologies............................................................................................ | 45 |
| Advanced Materials................................................................................................... | 55 |
| Functional Materials................................................................................................ | 55 |
| Structural Materials................................................................................................. | 56 |
| Mesoscopic Materials............................................................................................. | 57 |
| Smart Materials...................................................................................................... | 57 |
| Power and Water Systems...................................................................................... | 59 |
| Mathematics.............................................................................................................. | 60 |
| Microelectromechanical Systems (MEMS)................................................................. | 60 |
| Beyond Silicon.......................................................................................................... | 62 |
| Index of Programs..................................................................................................... | 65 |
| DARPA Programs Cross-Referenced by Program Element and Project Number. | 68 |
|
Programs in this area are aimed at finding solutions to urgent, difficult, and dangerous threats to U.S. national security, which require an in-depth response beyond that of the Military Services. In particular, these programs are meant to counter asymmetric and transnational threats, such as terrorist, biological warfare, or information attacks, and maintain unhindered U.S. access to space. DARPA SUPPORT FOR THE GLOBAL WAR ON TERRORISM Operation Enduring Freedom Since September 11, the war on terrorism has been foremost in everyone’s minds. Several DARPA technologies are being used to support Operation Enduring Freedom. Water Purification: Warfighters are testing 6-inch-long pen-sized water purification kits developed by DARPA that consume plain salt tablets and purify up to 300 liters of water on a single camera battery. Automatic Phrase Translators: In Afghanistan today, warfighters are using hand-held machine phrase translation devices that support direct operations, such as force protection, medical triage, and refugee re-unification; the devices are deployed at our embassy and with forces in the field. These systems support such local native languages as Pashto, Urdu, and Dari. While this one-way technology was militarily hardened and delivered in just 90 days, the follow-on effort, producing a task-constrained two-way speech translation capability, will have its first prototype in the hands of warfighters and embassy staff before the end of this fiscal year, a functional capability that simply does not exist anywhere today. Rapid Network Tool: In early 2000, DARPA and the Air Force launched a joint experiment to address critical Link 16 network shortfalls demonstrated in Kosovo. This experiment had very rapid payoff with DARPA-developed software tools now being used in Operation Enduring Freedom to reconfigure a theater-wide Link 16 network for military aircraft in a few hours – a task that previously took many weeks. Rapid Planning: The Active Templates program, working in close collaboration with the Joint Special Operations Command, has developed the software tools-of-choice for special operations command and control. These tools allow military planners to sketch out plans against a time-line or with a map or image in the background, merge plans from other teams that are connected to the network, de-conflict and coordinate changes as plans solidify, and then use these same tools to track the progress of the battle during mission execution. Time-and-motion studies show that these tools speed planning by a factor of four, buying time for rehearsal and critical decision-making. These prototype tools were advocated for use following several successful special operations exercises in FY 2001. In October, they were deployed and have been used continually to support combat operations in Operation Enduring Freedom. Operation Noble Eagle Medical Surveillance: The Air Force’s Lightweight Epidemiology Advanced Detection and Emergency Response System (LEADERS) uses key components of DARPA’s Enhanced Consequence Management Planning and Support System. A commercialized version of the DARPA bio-surveillance program, LEADERS, provided medical surveillance for signs and symptoms of a biological attack for the state of New York within 24 hours of the attack on the World Trade Center. The Centers for Disease Control also used LEADERS to monitor for specified syndromes from hospitals within in the New York City area and report them back in real-time to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta via the Internet. Capitol Hill Remediation: As a result of DARPA’s investments in the Immune Building program, DARPA was asked to serve as science advisors to the team responsible for the anthrax decontamination on Capitol Hill. DARPA was asked to review decontamination technologies and, in support of this request, we also conducted quick-turnaround testing on three separate candidates to determine efficacy. The chlorine dioxide approach developed under Immune Buildings was selected for the challenging job of remediating the Hart Senate Office Building. In addition, DARPA helped identify and obtain air sampling equipment to support the Environmental Protection Agency and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention efforts to verify that the buildings were safe for reoccupation. DARPA has also supported Congress by developing, installing, and testing mail-screening equipment to prevent additional contamination from entering the buildings through the mail system. Advanced Airport Security: Following the September 11 aircraft hijackings, the Secretary of Defense directed DARPA to conduct a study of aviation security aimed at the future needs of our country. DARPA sought information from a wide variety of Government agencies, Defense contractors, commercial vendors, and Federal laboratories, as well as from individuals with no previous aviation security experience. The outcome of the study recognizes that substantial organizational, procedural and technical challenges exist. Proposed solutions range from straightforward engineering tasks that may satisfy near-term security needs, all the way to those that may require scientific breakthroughs in order to assure protection against an evolving threat. DARPA is now working closely with agencies, such as Transportation Security Agency, Federal Aviation Agency, Department of Transportation, Immigration and Naturalization Service, and the Office of Homeland Security as they work to develop and implement more capable security operations. Information Awareness The most serious asymmetric threat facing the U.S. is terrorism. This threat is characterized by collections of people loosely organized in shadowy networks that are difficult to identify and define. These networks must be detected, identified, and tracked. IAO plans to develop technology that will allow understanding of the intent of terrorist networks, their plans, and potentially define opportunities for disrupting or eliminating the threats. To effectively and efficiently carry this out, technology must be developed that will promote sharing, collaborating, and reasoning to convert nebulous data to knowledge and actionable options. IAO will accomplish this by pursuing the development of technologies, components, and applications to produce a prototype system. Today’s intelligence infrastructure was designed for the Cold War and is well-suited to major military conflicts and strategic threats. However, our information about foreign terrorists is spotty at best – and our efforts to integrate and extend current intelligence systems is unlikely to provide sufficient coverage. Foreign terrorists do not require large numbers to cause great damage, nor must they attack us frequently to influence us: they are low-density, low-intensity combatants. Commercial information technology provides foreign terrorists with cheap, effective communications, planning data, and command and control capabilities – as good as most governments. The availability of biological and chemical weapons, in addition to novel methods of attack, pose a broad and continuing threat to the U.S. To address today’s threat, we need to turn information technology around and use it against foreign terrorists, gathering so much information on them that we can predict and preempt attacks – or, at the very least, strike back with speed, certainty, and finality. The kind of information we need today differs significantly from what we needed during the Cold War. We will need much more information, from both “traditional” intelligence sources and many more sources in addition, and we will need to filter this information to protect the privacy of U.S. citizens and innocents world-wide. We will also need new technology for effectively managing all this information and for reducing the cost of building the many new specific systems required to capture information. Because raw data must be interpreted, we need a collection of automated and semi-automated technologies that amplify the efforts of human analysts to provide greatly improved attack prediction and preemption capabilities. Finally, we need more effective methods for sharing information between Government agencies – capabilities for rapidly assembling teams of people with the right experience and relationships by means of effective tools that support collaboration across organizational boundaries. DARPA’s Information Awareness Office was established to create component technologies to address these needs. Example technologies of interest to IAO are:
DARPA’s information awareness programs will leverage other DARPA investments in information and other relevant technologies. DARPA plans to work closely with the Intelligence Community, other agencies of the national security community, and other relevant agencies of the U.S. Government. The Total Information Awareness (TIA) program will develop and integrate information technologies into a prototype system to detect, classify, and identify potential foreign terrorists so that we may have a better understanding of their plans, thereby increasing the probability that the U.S. can preempt adverse actions. The TIA program will integrate technologies developed by DARPA (and elsewhere, as appropriate) into a series of increasingly powerful prototype systems that can be stress-tested in operationally relevant environments using real-time feedback to refine concepts of operation and performance requirements down to the component level. The ultimate goal is to create a counter-terrorism information system that: (i) increases the information coverage by an order-of-magnitude and can be easily scaled; (ii) provides focused warnings within an hour after a triggering event occurs or an evidence threshold is passed; (iii) can automatically cue analysts based on partial pattern matches and has patterns that cover 90 percent of all known previous foreign terrorist attacks; and (iv) supports collaboration, analytical reasoning, and information sharing so that analysts can hypothesize, test, and propose theories and mitigating strategies about possible futures so that decision-makers can effectively evaluate the impact of current or future policies. DARPA will work in close collaboration with one or more U.S. intelligence agencies that will provide operational guidance and evaluation and will act as a technology maturation and transition partner. In the near-term, this collaboration will take place within the U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command. TIA’s focus is on developing usable tools, rather than conducting demonstrations. The program intends to create fully functional, leave-behind prototypes that are reliable, easy to install, and packaged with documentation and source code (though not necessarily complete in terms of desired features) that will enable the Intelligence Community to evaluate new TIA technology through experimentation and rapidly transition it to operational use, as appropriate. Below, we describe the component programs that contribute to TIA: Project Genoa, which is concluding, provides the structured argumentation, decision-making, and corporate memory to rapidly deal with, and adjust to, dynamic crisis management. Project Genoa is developing information technology for the Intelligence Community to rapidly and systematically accumulate evidence, facilitate collaboration while protecting critical information, and test hypotheses that support decision-making at the national level. In FY 2000, Project Genoa matured and transitioned a new “thematic” search engine tool to users on Intelink. The tool, “Athens,” complements traditional search engines by allowing users to find nuggets of information in large collections of documents without having to construct a complicated query. A thematic search engine is more efficient for two reasons. First, it allows the user to specify keywords one at a time and exposes the search index by providing all related keywords and the amount of information that would be returned at each step. Users can build search queries incrementally, selecting additional search terms from a list – there is less information to sift through to find the information one needs, and one never gets 10,000 hits on a query, which is the frequent result of using ordinary search engines. Second, a thematic search engine also reduces the information returned by breaking up HTML pages into smaller units, e.g., paragraphs or a few sentences. With a standard search engine, the smallest unit of information is a complete page, even though, most of the time, an analyst’s question is very specific. With the standard engine, the analyst has to scan a lot of irrelevant information to find the desired bit. Based on successful technology demonstrations, the Defense Intelligence Agency has agreed to be a transition partner for Project Genoa technology. In FY 2001, Genoa evidence-accumulation components were delivered to the Office of the Secretary of Defense and Joint Staff Directorate for Intelligence, the Joint Information Operations Center, the Joint Forces Command, the U.S. Pacific Command, and the Joint Counter-intelligence Assessment Group (JCAG). JCAG is now actively using Genoa capabilities to support and enhance its own critical mission. Furthermore, JCAG is using these same capabilities to support other Federal agencies involved in the war on terrorism, most notably the Department of Justice’s Foreign Terrorist Tracking Task Force. The use of DARPA-developed capabilities to counter and preempt foreign and domestic terrorist threats is an excellent example of how sustained investment in science and technology provides support to the warfighter. In FY 2002, these transition activities will be completed. Project Genoa II, part of DARPA’s Total Information Awareness program, will focus on the information technology support needed by teams of intelligence analysts and operations and policy personnel as they attempt to anticipate and preempt asymmetric threats to U.S. interests. The U.S. Government has been slow to change concept of operations and to assimilate new information technologies for this purpose. Needed are faster systems of humans and machines, ways to overcome the biases and limitations of the human cognitive system, “cognitive amplifiers” that help teams of people rapidly and deeply understand complicated and uncertain situations, and a breaking-down of existing stovepiped information repositories. Genoa II will respond with elements aimed at making the teams faster, smarter, and “more joint.” The project will apply automation to team processes so that more can be accomplished sooner – more information will be exploited, more hypotheses created and examined, more models built and populated with evidence, and, in the larger sense, more crises situations dealt with simultaneously. It will develop and deploy cognitive aids that allow humans and machines to think together about complicated problems, especially new and deadly asymmetric challenges intended to bypass our existing national security apparatus. Genoa II’s products will be deployed to the U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command. The Genisys program will produce technology for an ultra-large, all-source information repository to help prevent foreign terrorist attacks on the citizens, institutions, and property of the U.S. and its allies. To predict, track, and thwart (or, at least, mitigate) attacks, the U.S. needs a full-coverage database that includes information about all potential foreign terrorists and possible supporters, terrorist material, training/preparation/rehearsal activities, potential targets, specific plans, and the status of our defenses. Current database technology is clearly insufficient to address the need to integrate all relevant existing databases and semi-structured information sources, to automatically populate the new repository with many different and non-traditional data-feeds, and to enable the easy creation of new information systems, which today exist only in manual form. Today’s database technology was defined in the 1980s, but current processors, disks, and networks are a thousand times more capable. Genisys will reinvent this technology to meet today’s needs and capabilities. In contrast to today’s relational databases, Genisys will: (i) require no a priori data modeling and use a simpler query language, making it easier to dramatically increase the information coverage we now know we need to stop foreign terrorists; (ii) support automated restructuring and projection of data, making it easier to declassify and share data between Government organizations and with coalition partners; (iii) store data in context of time and space to help resolve uncertainty that always exists in data, but is not modeled today; (iv) create privacy filters, aliasing methods, and automated data expunging agents to protect the privacy of U.S. citizens and those who have nothing to do with foreign terrorists; and (v) develop a large, distributed system architecture for managing the huge volume of raw data input, analysis results, and feedback – the goal being a simpler, more flexible data store that still performs well and allows us to retain important data forever. The goal of the program is not only to demonstrate technologies, but also to develop a series of increasingly powerful leave-behind prototypes so that the Intelligence Community can get value immediately and provide feedback to focus research. These technologies and components will feed into the Total Information Awareness program. The Evidence Extraction and Link Discovery (EELD) program is developing technologies and tools for automated discovery, extraction, and linking of sparse evidence contained in large amounts of classified and unclassified data sources. EELD is developing detection capabilities to extract relevant data and relationships about people, organizations, locations, and activities from message traffic and open source data. It will then link together related items that comprise potential terrorist groups or scenarios and learn patterns of different groups or scenarios to identify new organizations or emerging threats. EELD has demonstrated the feasibility of extracting organizational relationships in the context of a business domain, and it has validated the existence of detectable patterns representing potential terrorist threat scenarios. EELD also developed two promising techniques for learning patterns of activity that allow for recognition and visualization of relationships as they change over time. In FY 2001, EELD selected techniques the program will develop for evidence extraction, link discovery, pattern learning, and scenarios, and the program initiated the collection and characterization of documents for technology evaluations. In FY 2002, EELD is developing and demonstrating technology to extract relationships, and detect and learn single-link (e.g., financial transactions or communications events between individuals) type patterns. In FY 2003, EELD will extend its capabilities to the extraction of data from multiple sources (e.g., text messages and web pages), with an ability to adapt rapidly to new threat domains. The EELD program will also develop the ability to detect instances of patterns comprising multiple link types (e.g., financial transactions, communications, and travel), and it will develop the ability to learn patterns comprised of multiple types of entities (e.g., persons and organizations) and multiple link types. The Wargaming the Asymmetric Environment (WAE) program will develop and demonstrate specific, predictive technology to better anticipate and act against terrorists. WAE is a revolutionary approach to identifying predictive indicators of terrorist-specific attacks and behaviors by examining their behavior in the broader context of their political, cultural, and ideological environment. Initial test results demonstrate the feasibility of developing automated and adaptive behavior prediction models tuned to specific terrorist groups and individuals. Specifically, WAE has developed, in conjunction with DoD and the Intelligence Community, indication and warning models for select terrorist individuals and organizations. These indication and warning models have been tested historically and, in some cases, operationally, to predict an active terrorist group’s next action (attack/no attack, target characteristics, location characteristics, tactical characteristics, timeframes, and motivating factors). The results of these tests are statistically significant, and several models have been transitioned to our DoD and Intelligence Community partners. In FY 2002, WAE is extending its predictive technology research to model a larger set of terrorist groups and individuals, and it will further exploit predictive technologies to increase the level of detail for each predictive model. In FY 2003, WAE will develop terrorist-specific intervention models based upon their respective motivational factors. The Translingual Information Detection, Extraction and Summarization (TIDES) program is creating technology to enable English speakers to locate and interpret critical information in multiple languages without requiring knowledge of those languages. The source data could be unformatted raw audio or text, stationary or streaming; critical information could span one or more sources in one or more languages. TIDES technology includes synergistic components for: (i) finding or discovering needed information; (ii) extracting key information about entities, relations, and events; (iii) substantially reducing the amount that a person must read; and (iv) converting foreign language material to English. TIDES has created two text and audio processing systems (known as OnTAP and MiTAP) and is using them in Integrated Feasibility Experiments involving bio-security and terrorism. The experiments, being conducted at contractor facilities with the assistance of military and intelligence personnel, are designed to assess the utility of the evolving technology, to learn where improvements are needed, to develop effective concepts of operation, and to jump-start the transfer of the most effective technology into operational use. Work on Arabic was substantially accelerated in response to the events of September 11. In FY 2003, TIDES will demonstrate initial machine translation capabilities from Chinese and Arabic to English. These demonstrations will be done for Navy and Intelligence Community partners at various U.S. locations. The goal of TIDES is not simply to increase productivity: it provides commanders and other decision-makers with a great deal of timely, vital information that is currently out of reach. The Human Identification at a Distance (HumanID) program is developing automated biometric identification technologies to detect, recognize, and identify humans at great distances. A biometric technology is a method for identifying an individual from his face, fingerprints, or the way he walks. These technologies will provide critical early warning support for force protection and homeland defense against terrorist, criminal, and other human-based threats. It will prevent or decrease the success rate of such attacks against DoD operational facilities and installations. The program will develop methods for fusing these biometric technologies into advanced human identification systems to enable faster, more accurate, and unconstrained identification at great distances. In FY 2001, HumanID developed a pilot force protection system to identify humans at a distance in outdoor operational DoD settings. It used specific Military Service sites as prototype models for designing demonstrations and experiments. The program also performed preliminary assessments of current and future technologies. In FY 2002, HumanID plans to develop a prototype advanced human identification system and develop methods and algorithms for fusing biometric technologies and deriving biometric signatures. The system will be evaluated and demonstrated at a variety of force protection and homeland defense sites. HumanID will determine the critical factors that affect performance of biometric components and identify the limits of range, accuracy, and reliability. Only the most promising technologies will continue development based upon evaluation of their performance. In FY 2003, HumanID plans to extend the prototype identification system and further develop biometric fusion algorithms for up to five biometric components. The program will also conduct multi-modal fusion experiments and performance evaluations. Advanced human recognition capabilities will be demonstrated in multiple force protection and/or homeland defense environments. The objective of the Bio-Surveillance program is to develop the necessary information technologies and resulting prototype system capable of detecting a large-scale, covert release of a biological pathogen automatically and significantly earlier than with traditional approaches. The key to mitigating a biological attack is early detection. Given the availability of appropriate medications, as many as half the expected casualties could be prevented if an attack were detected only a few days earlier than if detection were delayed until after a significant number of infected individuals entered the health-care system. We are seeking to achieve this increase by monitoring non-traditional data sources, such as animal health, behavioral indicators, and pre-diagnostic medical data. Technical challenges include correlating/integrating information derived from heterogeneous data sources, development of autonomous signal detection algorithms, refinement of disease models for autonomous detection, and ensuring privacy protection. The program will leverage existing disease models and “mine” existing databases to determine the most valuable early indicators for abnormal health conditions. The program will also develop techniques to determine the best way to differentiate “normal” outbreaks of disease from deliberate bio-terrorist releases. The program will develop enhanced automated privacy protection methods to assure the anonymity of records accessed by the data monitoring software. End-to-end prototypes in two cities of military interest will be constructed for evaluation of the data sources and detection techniques. The Bio-Surveillance program will dramatically increase DoD’s ability to detect a clandestine biological warfare attack in time to respond effectively and, therefore, avoid potentially thousands of casualties. During FY 2002, the program will identify, characterize, and evaluate non-traditional data sources and detection algorithms. During FY 2003, the program will incorporate disease progression simulations and privacy protection algorithms. Technology developed under this program will be available for transition to military and civilian bio-surveillance systems. The specific goal of the DARPA Communicator program is to develop and demonstrate “dialogue interaction” technology that enables warriors to talk with computers. Information will be accessible on the battlefield or in command centers without the warfighter ever having to touch a keyboard. The Communicator Platform will be wireless and mobile, and will function in a networked environment. Software-enabling dialogue interaction will automatically focus on the context of a dialogue to improve performance. Moreover, the system will adapt to new topics automatically, so that the conversation seems natural and efficient. The technology emphasizes computer-human arbitrated dialogue that uses task knowledge to compensate for natural language effects (e.g., dialects, disfluences, and noisy environments). The majority of the research effort has been on English/computer dialogues in support of command and control operations. Recently, research has begun on foreign language computer interaction in support of coalition operations. Unlike automated translation of news for unlimited vocabulary (speech-to-text, text-to-text) tasks, the effort here is directed toward human-to-machine interactions with task-specific issues that constrain vocabularies. In FY 1999, the program created an open-source architecture for a spoken language dialog system, which is being used by researchers and engineers to experiment with dialogue interaction techniques. In FY 2000, Communicator technology was used for logistic, command and control, and on-the-move information access experiments. DARPA and the sponsoring testers (U.S. Navy and U.S. Marine Corps, through the Small Unit Logistics Advanced Concept Technology Demonstration) evaluated the system and architecture as being highly effective and having potential impact for use in future systems. In FY 2001, hands-on exercises were conducted for small unit logistics operations with the U.S. Marine Corps at Millennium Dragon (using a SINCGARS radio for a field interface) in order to stress-test the technology in extremely noisy and variable environments. In FY 2002, the Communicator system is being stressed in experiments with the Navy on the Sea Shadow and the F/A-18 maintenance mentor at Naval Air Station Patuxent River to support monitoring and alerting of systems, while concurrently improving both information access and distribution. The final Communicator experiment will demonstrate dialogue interaction with a wide array of distributed sensors, heterogeneous databases, and new noisy environments as the U.S. Army evaluates Communicator’s ability to automate the combat casualty reporting system. The measure of success will be performance gains for operators using natural dialogue interaction for high-stress and time-critical tasks. Success will validate a new approach for the way 21st century warriors interact with computers, and dialogue interaction will provide for new and effective concepts of operation. A FY 2003 follow-on project focusing Communicator on a command and control problem (e.g., a ship-wide, agent-based dialog network supporting system-wide monitoring and diagnosis aboard the Sea Shadow), as well as a tactical operations task (e.g., fielding the U.S. Army combat casualty system on the Land Warrior platform), may be used to ensure an effective transition mechanism for this revolutionary new interaction technology. The goal of the Babylon program is to develop rapid, two-way, natural language speech translation interfaces and platforms for users in combat and other field environments with constrained military task domains of force protection, refugee processing, and medical triage. The seedling of Babylon, Rapid Multilingual Support, is being deployed to Afghanistan in the spring of 2002. Also under consideration is the appropriateness of developing a Babylon module for use at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to support prisoner interrogation. Babylon will focus on overcoming the many technical and engineering challenges limiting current multilingual translation technology. Babylon will provide an enabling technology to give language support to the warfighter in deciphering possibly critical language communications during operations in foreign territories. The first year (FY 2002) goal of the Babylon program is to build and rapidly deploy one-way speech translation systems in four target languages – Pashto, Dari, Arabic, and Mandarin – for direct support of overseas field operatives. The systems are delivered in the form of militarized palm-sized PDA devices with 12 hour battery endurance. In FY 2003, each of four Babylon two-way translation teams will develop 10 working-domain-constrained natural language translation prototypes on multiple platforms. Each system will undergo an evaluation process, and the successful teams will advance and continue to refine their systems through technology patches and insertions. In future years, we will expand domains (tasks) supported by our prototypes, and we will improve robustness and enhance the ability of the prototype to meet practical field requirements. This technology is immature and unstable due to the vast complexities of human-to-human communications. Open-domain (multitask), unconstrained dialog translation in multiple environments is still five to 10 years away. DARPA’s research is the stimulus to make sure that that capability becomes a reality. Babylon is focusing on low-population, high-terrorist-risk languages that will not be supported by any commercial enterprise. PROTECTION FROM BIOLOGICAL WARFARE ATTACK A clear and growing national security need is homeland defense and protection of our military forces from biological warfare attack by both military and terrorist organizations. The goal of DARPA’s Biological Warfare Defense thrust is to deter or thwart such attacks by developing the needed the sensors, medical diagnostics and countermeasures, building protection systems, and air and water purification devices. Sensors To detect the presence of a threat agent, DARPA is investing in the development of advanced Biosensor Defense Systems that are robust, autonomous, fast, and sensitive to any known bacterial or viral organism, as well as to novel natural or engineered biowarfare agents. Two example systems are the TIGER and BioTOF sensor systems. TIGER, or Triangulation for Genetic Evaluation of Risks, is a novel and potentially universal approach to bio-detection. The TIGER sensor system combines a new triangulation approach for universal genome evaluation with advanced mass spectrometry and rigorous bio-informatic analysis. Triangulation involves integrating data from multiple regions along an organism’s genome to derive a unique identifier for that organism. This enables high performance (95 percent probability of detection), detection and classification of known, unknown, and bioengineered threats in complex mixtures. In FY 2001, we developed an end-to-end model that was used to make quantitative performance predictions based on existing sequence databases. During FY 2002, we are developing a “laboratory quality” TIGER system to gather data in real environments. We will use the model and data to design a prototype system in FY 2003. DARPA’s Biological Time-of-Flight Sensor (BioTOF) is a Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometer that will provide fast and accurate identification of biological warfare pathogens. In FY 2002, we will complete a rigorous evaluation of BioTOF brass-boards with completely automated sample collection and processing. Characterization of instrument performance will guide the design of the follow-on prototypes. DARPA is also developing a nucleic-acid-based microarray sensor to integrate and automate DNA/RNA isolation, labeling, and hybridization procedures into a single platform. The program has developed a first-generation biochip sensor designed to determine whether anthrax is present and to enable fast discrimination of hoaxes from real threats using universal ribosomal sequences. In FY 2002, we are developing a pox biochip for the detection of the family of pox virus related to smallpox. This pox biochip has been sent to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for testing. In FY 2003, we plan to develop a plague and toxin biochip. We are rigorously characterizing these systems for their detection performance against live agent challenges and realistic clutter, including a detailed evaluation of the detection and false alarm probabilities. Traditional sensors and detection technologies require previous knowledge about the structure or identity of the threat and only report on whether that known threat is present or not. The goal of the Tissue Based Biosensors and Activity Detection Technologies programs is to build sensor systems that detect a wide range of threats, including unknown, genetically engineered, or emerging threat agents. The programs are investigating whether it is possible to build sensors around cells or pieces of tissue to alert us to the presence of a toxic environment. These systems use the physiological response of biological cells and tissues to detect biological or chemical threats. We constructed a variety of laboratory prototypes in FY 2001, including an integrated chip microarray that incorporates liver tissue and measures liver response following exposure to biological agents and chemical toxins. We are also building and evaluating systems using lung tissue, neuronal cells, cardiac cells, fish chromatophores, and engineered B-cells. We demonstrated that we could build a shipping module that would allow the neurons to be stored or shipped and still remain stable and viable for up to a couple of months. In FY 2002, we are continuing the development of these systems to screen them against a wider list of chemical and biological threats and to determine the limits of sensitivity and false alarm rates. In FY 2003, we will begin to adapt the systems for testing and evaluation in a number of operational scenarios, including water-quality monitoring and air-quality monitoring. Medical Diagnostics and Countermeasures In the event of a biological attack, the U.S. will need to identify those who have been exposed to a biological warfare agent and to distinguish them from the “worried well,” as well as from those with natural diseases that might require different treatment. Therefore, identifying disease markers that can serve as rapid indicators of exposure is one of the focus areas of the Advanced Medical Diagnostics program. Efforts continue to define gene expression profiles following exposure to biological threat agents. In FY 2001, researchers identified unique genes that are only turned on following exposure. These genes can now be used to identify chip-based diagnostic systems, as well as therapeutic targets of action. Another activity in this program is identifying markers in exhaled breath that may be used to determine who has been exposed to a potential pathogen. In FY 2001, we made significant progress in establishing diagnostic detection equipment based on antibody detection of pathogens. The program transitioned this time-resolved fluorescence technology to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which has successfully validated assays for four threat agents for their emergency response network. Rapid sequencing techniques have also advanced significantly in FY 2001, with demonstrations of rapid sequencing through nanopores at Harvard University. Additional efforts initiated in FY 2002 expand the investment in rapid sequencing, using natural enzymes responsible for reading DNA to sequence DNA in real-time. Further efforts in FY 2003 will be aimed at new mathematical tools to extract information from data-rich diagnostic collection procedures in order to provide early pre-symptomatic diagnostic detection. The Unconventional Pathogen Countermeasures (UPC) program is developing broad-spectrum countermeasures for threat pathogens. This includes anti-viral and antibiotic drug discovery and development, as well as new approaches to vaccinations. Three UPC projects have shown promise in initial evaluations and are transitioning to the U.S. Army Medical Research Institute for Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID) for further development: a drug designed to attack the DNA of bacteria, viruses and malaria; a family of drugs that target a common and critical enzyme in anthrax and other bacteria; and a protein fragment that blocks the effects of toxins released by bacteria. In addition, the U.S. Army Institute for Surgical Research, Fort Sam Houston, is evaluating skin decontamination by nanoemulsion technology. In FY 2002, we anticipate transitioning other successes to USAMRIID, including novel antibiotic therapeutics, computer-based approaches to shorten the time to develop new antibiotics, and novel vaccines/immune stimulants and platforms. A novel vaccine enhancer developed under the UPC program is likely to transition to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention or USAMRIID later this year. By FY 2003, we expect to have additional programs ready for transition including vaccine candidates, novel enzyme antibacterial therapeutics, and new approaches to using computers to accelerate the process of discovering therapeutics. Building Protection In addition to Biological Warfare Defense component technologies, DARPA is developing complete system solutions to counter the biological warfare threat. The goal of the Immune Building program, begun in FY 2001, is to make military buildings far less attractive targets for attack by chemical or biological warfare agents by reducing the effectiveness of such attacks via active and passive response of heating, ventilation, and air conditioning systems, and other building infrastructure (e.g., neutralization and filtration). This ambitious goal can only be achieved through a combination of technology development and systems-level experimentation. The program is leveraging earlier efforts in these technologies (e.g., decontaminating foams and novel materials that can be used for both chemical and biological filtration) and is extending them for use in this application. The program is also developing new component technologies specifically for this application, such as: using chlorine dioxide for the decontamination of small, inaccessible spaces within buildings; specialized low-pressure-drop filtration for use at return vents; and high-efficiency/long-lifetime sources of ultraviolet radiation for on-the-fly neutralization of agents in airways and ductwork. In FY 2001, we initiated a number of these technology development efforts. In addition, several industry teams evaluated candidate architectures for complete building protection systems. In FY 2002, those technologies and prototypes that successfully passed the evaluation process will be incorporated as components of the complete protection system. We will instrument full-scale test-beds for experimentation with end-to-end systems. Two industry teams are currently refurbishing existing facilities at the old Fort McClellan site (AL) and the Nevada Test Site (NV) for complete system tests scheduled for Government evaluation in FY 2003. The results of these experiments will drive the design of optimal protection systems in FY 2003. In addition, we are developing and validating a modeling capability to enable the application of Immune Building principles to future buildings. To help address the “anthrax letter” problem, DARPA has also initiated efforts to develop portal barrier technologies and to screen and/or neutralize chemical or biological agents in mail and closed containers. Air And Water Purification Clean air and water are crucial to the sustained operation of our Military Services in the event of a biological and chemical warfare attack. To-date, our program in
Air and Water Purification has demonstrated encouraging results. Warfighters must be able to obtain potable water quickly, and their water purification devices and beverage containers must be integrated in order to work and pack away together. In one project, a pen-sized mixed chemical oxidant unit kills or inactivates microbial pathogens, prevents re-growth of microbial contaminants for days after initial treatment, and provides an order-of-magnitude improvement in disinfection against spores compared with chlorine or iodine. The mixed-oxidant operated water treatment pens are now being selectively field-tested by the U.S. Marines Corps and Special Forces personnel in Afghanistan. The U.S. Marine Corps plans to transition this device into their official enhancement program. PROTECTION FROM INFORMATION ATTACK The Department of Defense has a critical and growing dependence on the information systems that are key to the future joint vision of warfare. Moreover, our critical infrastructures – and the economic success of our nation – similarly depend on this technology, and the poor state of security in those networks and systems is a well-recognized national vulnerability. Widely used commercial software is riddled with security holes, and attacks are so common that the DoD and other large organizations require full-time staffs to analyze and respond to serious incidents, while still only seeing a small portion of all attacks. Computers and networks in the private sector are poorly defended and can be compromised and turned to attack DoD networks without the knowledge of the system owner. At the same time, potential nation-state adversaries are known to be preparing cyber attack techniques to undermine U.S. computers and infrastructures in case of a conflict.
The following program descriptions provide additional details: The Operational Partners in Experimentation program rapidly puts advanced information assurance technology into the warfighter’s hands for accelerated transition to the operational community and improved feedback to the research community. Operational Partners in Experimentation provides a risk-managed process for high-tempo operators to evaluate revolutionary, but experimental, technologies like embedded firewall or anomaly-based intrusion detection systems. The DARPA embedded firewall demonstrated tremendous success in stopping a military red team during the 2001 Fleet Battle Experiment India, where it was identified by the Navy as the most promising technology. The Navy has already begun the process of programming and budgeting to buy these embedded firewalls in bulk, and the specific technical results from the ramp-up to these exercises invariably provides feedback crucial to the effective maturation of these technologies. As a second example, anomaly-based intrusion detection holds the potential of detecting the more sophisticated threats that slip by current sensors, while reducing by a factor of 100 the volume of noise through which analysts must sift to find such threats. Based on early findings, the Department of Defense’s Computer Emergency Response Team has already incorporated DARPA anomaly detection into an upgrade of the Joint Intrusion Detection System, fielded worldwide. We are studying possibilities for extending these breakthroughs to coalition operations in FY 2003. MAINTAIN UNHINDERED ACCESS TO SPACE AND PROTECT U.S. SPACE
CAPABILITIES DARPA is placing an increased emphasis on developing and flying space technologies and spacecraft for new missions. The importance of space to our nation and its security was expressed by the Commission to Assess United States National Security Space Management and Organization, whose final report stated that:
One of the Commission’s five conclusions concerned space science and technology:
The Secretary of Defense has directed that DARPA, along with the Service laboratories, undertake research and demonstration of innovative space technologies and systems for dedicated military missions. The DARPA investments in space are consistent with our charter to solve national-level technology problems, foster high-risk, high-payoff military technologies to enable operational dominance, and to avoid technological surprise. Two of the strengths DARPA brings to space R&D are the flexibilities provided by Congress in our hiring processes and in our contracting methods for rapid prototype development. These enable DARPA to take advantage of rapidly evolving commercial technologies and emerging scientific breakthroughs to create real innovation in space systems. Programs in this area are aimed at developing the advanced systems and technologies needed to achieve Full Spectrum Dominance, leapfrogging current capabilities and threats to give our warfighters a decisive edge. Sub-areas of particular note here are Affordable, Precision, Moving Target Kill, and Combined Manned and Unmanned Systems. AFFORDABLE, PRECISION, MOVING TARGET KILL Current approaches to destroying time-critical moving targets include area-of-effect munitions and man-in-the-loop targeting. These approaches traditionally involve large and very expensive weapons, the potential for large collateral damage, and, often, the requirement to put a warfighter in harm’s way. DARPA is responding by developing low-cost, highly capable weapon systems networked to a variety of sensors in order to precisely find and destroy the right land targets in any terrain, in any weather, moving or not, at any time. Information Exploitation On October 31, 2001, DARPA established the Information Exploitation Office to emphasize development of sensor and information system technology and systems with application to battlespace awareness, targeting, command and control, and the supporting infrastructure required to address land-based threats in a dynamic, closed-loop process. Programs will leverage ongoing DARPA efforts in sensors, sensor exploitation, information management, and command and control. Pooling these programs together in one office will provide additional focus to agency efforts addressing the systemic challenges associated with performing surface target interdiction in environments that require very high combat identification confidence and an associated low likelihood for inadvertent collateral damage. The programs will exploit the synergies between:
Threats of interest include mobile and fixed surface targets in all environments, i.e., open, partially obscured, in “hide” (e.g., under foliage), in evasive maneuver, and in urban settings. The
Tactical Targeting Network Technologies (TTNT) program is developing, evaluating, and demonstrating the airborne wireless networking communications technology necessary for denying sanctuary to time-critical surface targets (for example, mobile surface-to-air missiles and launchers, and armor columns). To rapidly target mobile opponents, the technology will provide high performance, robust, and interoperable data communications for tactical aircraft to work: (i) with each other; (ii) with unmanned air vehicles; (iii) with intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance platforms; and (iv) with ground stations. These communications support essential targeting and sensor-to-shooter coordination, such as that which is currently occurring on a very limited scale with Predator operations in Operation Enduring Freedom. TTNT goals include: (i) real-time, battle-driven communication capacity assignment; (ii) minimal delay for high-priority messages; (iii) a data-rate that can support secure video transmission; (iv) low-cost insertion into most platforms; and (v) complete coexistence with existing tactical data links, such as Link 16. Link 16, the current common data link for most air, sea, and critical ground platforms, originated 30 years ago. While robust, Link 16 was not designed to support growing U.S. targeting communication needs. TTNT will develop the responsive communications infrastructure required to conduct collaborative, time-critical targeting and prosecution on a dynamic battlefield. And TTNT will enable emerging targeting systems, such as Affordable Mobile Surface Target Engagement and Advanced Tactical Targeting Technologies, to achieve their full capabilities. TTNT contracts have been awarded to four prime contractors: L-3 Communications Corp. (Salt Lake City, UT); Rockwell Collins Inc (Cedar Rapids, IA); BAE Systems (Wayne, NJ); and VIASAT Inc (Carlsbad, CA). Technology study contracts have been awarded to Ohio University (Athens, OH), Purdue University (West Lafayette, IN), and the Southwest Research Institute (San Antonio, TX). The DoD Joint Spectrum Center is also under contract to the TTNT program. The close working relationship with the Joint Spectrum Center has allowed the program to address the issue of radio spectrum availability from the outset, permitting TTNT to anticipate and to avoid contention with both civilian and military users. Active monitoring of Asian and European leading edge civilian wireless technology development is being conducted via the Asian Technology Information Program (Albuquerque, NM). This activity ensures that rapidly evolving commercial wireless technologies are not overlooked if they can contribute to TTNT. In FY 2002, we will complete the initial system designs and conduct critical component tests, followed by a narrowing down to two or more designs for further development. These tests will be development tests to prove out the system concept and packing/integration techniques for minimizing the cost of widespread deployment. In FY 2003, the program will build brass-board designs and conduct hardware-in-the-loop tests of the candidate systems. If these development tests are successful, the proven concepts will be further tested in operationally realistic situations, with potential military user participation. COMBINED MANNED AND UNMANNED SYSTEMS The Unmanned Combat Air Vehicle (UCAV) program is a joint DARPA/Air Force System Demonstration Program to demonstrate the technical feasibility, military utility, and operational value for a UCAV system that can effectively and affordably prosecute suppression of enemy air defenses / strike missions within the emerging global command and control architecture. The DARPA-managed demonstration program will facilitate a seamless transition into an Air Force-managed, effects-based, spiral development program to develop the initial operational capabilities to meet the Congressional goal that one-third of U.S. military operational deep strike aircraft should be unmanned by 2010. In FY 2001, the two X-45A demonstrator aircraft and the mission control system were transported to NASA Dryden Flight Research Center, where integration tests were conducted. In FY 2002, the program will complete the first set of X-45A flight tests and the initial design reviews for the low-observable X-45B. In FY 2003, the program will complete multi-vehicle X-45A coordinated flight tests, conduct the X-45B final design review, and begin fabrication of long-lead items. At the end of FY 2003, the UCAV program management will transfer to the Air Force. The potential of the unmanned approach to hazardous air missions has also resulted in a joint DARPA/Navy
Naval Unmanned Combat Air Vehicle
(UCAV-N) program. The Navy has a need for sea-based, highly survivable, effective, and affordable air power to conduct deep strike, suppression of enemy air defenses, and surveillance missions as part of an integrated air campaign. A Naval Unmanned Combat Air Vehicle can prosecute the enemy integrated air defense system and high-value targets with relative impunity without placing a pilot in harm’s way. In addition, a UCAV-N capability that can maintain continuous vigilance will enable advanced surveillance, suppression of enemy air defenses, and immediate lethal strike for attacking time-critical targets. DARPA and the Department of the Navy have agreed to a joint program to validate the critical technologies, processes, and system attributes and to demonstrate the technical feasibility of a UCAV-N system. The UCAV-N Advanced Technology Demonstration program is structured in two phases: Phase I consists of analysis and preliminary design, and Phase II involves development and demonstration. In July 2000, DARPA awarded two Section 845 agreements to Boeing and Northrop Grumman for analysis and preliminary design of a UCAV-N air system, and those studies were completed in March 2001. In April 2001, the Phase I contracts were modified to permit more complete system preliminary design and to begin risk reduction of critical technologies, processes and system attributes. A successful conclusion to Phase I would lead to a seamless transition into Phase II, the detailed design and fabrication of UCAV-N, in March 2002. Phase II will continue through December 2004. |